Quantitative flow ratio—Meta‐analysis and systematic review
- 20 March 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 97 (5), 807-814
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28857
Abstract
Introduction Despite of the wide evidence of use fractional flow reserve (FFR), isolated angiography evaluation is still the main tool to indicate percutaneous coronary intervention. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new functional index to assess functional significance. Recently, few studies have showed the capacity of QFR to predict significance stenosis. The aim of this research has been to describe the evidence of QFR in this clinical setting, to analyze the global diagnosis accuracy of QFR versus FFR and to compare the difference in feasibility between retrospective and prospective analysis. Methods and results Systematic review of literature was performed. Eligible studies for the meta‐analysis were considered those directly evaluating de QFR versus FFR. Pooled values of diagnosis test and summary receiver operator curve were calculated. Main causes of not‐perform QFR analysis according to study design were also evaluated. Sixteen studies were included. Good correlation and agreement were showed. Global sensibility, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.84, 0.89, 0.80, and 0.92, respectively. Then, 18% of evaluated vessels could not be analyzed. Significant differences were found in the percentage of discarded vessels and the cause of nonperformed analysis between retrospective or prospective analysis. Conclusions Excellent correlation and agreement between QFR and FFR was demonstrated. QFR assessment could be improved by its prospective analysis with a dedicated protocol.Keywords
Funding Information
- Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (GRS 1728/A/18)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography: Modeling the Significance of Coronary Lesions: Results From the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) StudyJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2013
- Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Functional SYNTAX Score for Risk Assessment in Multivessel Coronary Artery DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011
- Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary InterventionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- How good are experienced interventional cardiologists at predicting the functional significance of intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery stenoses?International Journal of Cardiology, 2007
- One core laboratory at two international sites, is that feasible? An inter‐core laboratory and intra‐observer variability studyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2002
- Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test dataStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening testsBMJ, 2001
- Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary StenosisCirculation, 2001
- Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Coronary-Artery StenosesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1996