Validation of "(fr)AGILE": a quick tool to identify multidimensional frailty in the elderly
Open Access
- 29 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Geriatrics
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01788-1
Abstract
Background Several tools have been proposed and validated to operationally define frailty. Recently, the Italian Frailty index (IFi), an Italian modified version of Frailty index, has been validated but its use in clinical practice is limited by long time of administration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to create and validate a quick version of the IFi (AGILE). Methods Validation study was performed by administering IFi and AGILE, after a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in 401 subjects aged 65 or over (77 +/- 7 years). AGILE was a 10-items tool created starting from the more predictive items of the four domains of frailty investigated by IFi (mental, physical, socioeconomic and nutritional). AGILE scores were stratified in light, moderate and severe frailty. At 24 months of follow-up, death, disability (taking into account an increase in ADL lost >= 1 from the baseline) and hospitalization were considered. Area under curve (AUC) was evaluated for both IFi and AGILE. Results Administration time was 9.5 +/- 3.8 min for IFi administered after a CGA, and 2.4 +/- 1.2 min for AGILE, regardless of CGA (p < 0.001). With increasing degree of frailty, prevalence of mortality increased progressively from 6.5 to 41.8% and from 9.0 to 33.3%, disability from 16.1 to 64.2% and from 22.1 to 59.8% and hospitalization from 17.2 to 58.7% and from 27.0 to 52.2% with AGILE and IFi, respectively (p = NS). Relative Risk for each unit of increase in AGILE was 56, 44 and 24% for mortality, disability and hospitalization, respectively and was lower for IFi (8, 7 and 4% for mortality, disability and hospitalization, respectively). The AUC was higher in AGILE vs. IFi for mortality (0.729 vs. 0.698), disability (0.715 vs. 0.682) and hospitalization (0.645 vs. 0.630). Conclusions Our study shows that AGILE is a rapid and effective tool for screening multidimensional frailty, able to predict mortality, disability and hospitalization, especially useful in care settings that require reliable assessment instruments with short administration time.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physical vs. multidimensional frailty in older adults with and without heart failureESC Heart Failure, 2020
- Multidimensional Approach to FrailtyFrontiers in Psychology, 2020
- Measuring frailty in patients undergoing TAVI: how and why?European Heart Journal, 2019
- Multidimensional frailty evaluation in elderly outpatients with chronic heart failure: A prospective studyEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2019
- The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of FrailtyJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2017
- Frailty in Older PersonsClinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2017
- Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners reportAge and Ageing, 2014
- Frailty Consensus: A Call to ActionJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2013
- Frailty in elderly peopleThe Lancet, 2013
- Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Oncology, 2012