Estimating the Impact of Sterilization under a Government Campaign Using Contaminated Treatment Data
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Economic Development and Cultural Change
- Vol. 70 (1), 159-202
- https://doi.org/10.1086/711173
Abstract
We evaluate the effects of sterilizations resulting from a national campaign in Peru in the 1990s. We propose a modified inverse probability weighting estimator that accounts for data contamination that arises because while we observe sterilization status, we do not know which sterilizations occurred as a result of the campaign. We estimate that 70,000-90,000 women were sterilized because of the campaign and experienced an average decrease in completed fertility of approximately 0.8 children per woman. We find no effect of campaign-induced sterilizations on women's labor supply but find positive effects on children's health outcomes associated with better nutrition.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Family Planning and Child Health Care: Effect of the Peruvian Programa de Salud Reproductiva y Planificación Familiar, 1996–2000Population and Development Review, 2020
- Difference‐in‐differences when the treatment status is observed in only one periodJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2017
- Family Planning Program Effects: Evidence from MicrodataPopulation and Development Review, 2016
- The quality–quantity trade-off: evidence from the relaxation of China’s one-child policyJournal of Population Economics, 2013
- Nonlinear Models of Measurement ErrorsJournal of Economic Literature, 2011
- Contraception as Development? New Evidence from Family Planning in ColombiaThe Economic Journal, 2009
- The Politics of Reproductive Health in Peru: Gender and Social Policy in the Global SouthSocial Politics, 2007
- Chapter 52 Population Policies, Fertility, Women's Human Capital, and Child QualityHandbook of Development Economics, 2007