Gender Differences in the Genetic Factors Responsible for Variation in Bone Density and Ultrasound
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 17 (4), 725-733
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.725
Abstract
Although genetic factors are thought to explain a large proportion of the variation in bone density in women, few studies have been conducted in men. Therefore, it is unclear whether the individual differences in bone strength between men and women are a reflection of gender differences in the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on bone density variance. The aim of this study was to determine if there were gender differences in the genetic components of variance for bone density and ultrasound. In addition, the study aimed to explore the hypothesis that there are unique gender‐specific genetic determinants of these traits. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip, distal forearm, and lumbar spine were measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the calcaneus in healthy female twin pairs (286 identical [MZ] and 265 nonidentical [DZ]), male twin pairs (72 MZ and 65 DZ), and 82 opposite‐sex (OS) pairs aged between 18 and 80 years. For hip BMD, distal forearm, and QUS measurements, the differences between MZ correlations and like‐sex DZ correlations were similar for both sexes, suggesting little difference in the component of total variance explained by genetic factors between male and female twin pairs. However, correlations between OS twin pairs were lower than that of like‐sex twin pairs, suggesting the possibility of unique gender‐specific genetic effects. At the forearm, model fitting suggested a small gender difference in the magnitude of genetic variance as well as the presence of a unique gender‐specific genetic variance component. Hip, lumbar spine, and QUS measurements were better explained by models that assumed no gender differences in genetic variance between the sexes, but the study had insufficient power to detect small differences in the genetic components of variance. The results of this study suggest that the proportion of bone strength variance explained by genetic factors is similar for men and women. However, at some regions there is evidence to suggest a gender‐specific genetic component to the overall genetic variance.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Twins and Singletons Comparable? A Study of Disease-related and Lifestyle Characteristics in Adult WomenTwin Research, 2001
- Risk Factors for Longitudinal Bone Loss in Elderly Men and Women: The Framingham Osteoporosis StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2000
- Genetic Markers, Bone Mineral Density, and Serum Osteocalcin LevelsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999
- Bone Mineral Density and Its Change in Pre- and Perimenopausal White Women: The Michigan Bone Health StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Apparent Pre- and Postmenopausal Bone Loss Evaluated by DXA at Different Skeletal Sites in Women: The OFELY CohortJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Bone density determinants in elderly women: A twin studyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995
- Mineral density quantitation of the human cortical iliac crest by backscattered electron image analysis: Variations with age, sex, and degree of osteoarthritisBone, 1995
- Genetic determinants of bone mineral content at the spine and radius: A twin studyBone, 1987
- Metacarpal morphometry in monozygotic and dizygotic elderly twinsCalcified Tissue International, 1978
- Diagnosis of Twin Zygosity by Mailed QuestionnaireHuman Heredity, 1978