The Cardiac Care Bridge randomized trial in high‐risk older cardiac patients: A mixed‐methods process evaluation
Open Access
- 17 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 77 (5), 2498-2510
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14786
Abstract
Aim To evaluate healthcare professionals' performance and treatment fidelity in the Cardiac Care Bridge (CCB) nurse‐coordinated transitional care intervention in older cardiac patients to understand and interpret the study results. Design A mixed‐methods process evaluation based on the Medical Research Council Process Evaluation framework. Methods Quantitative data on intervention key elements were collected from 153 logbooks of all intervention patients. Qualitative data were collected using semi‐structured interviews with 19 CCB professionals (cardiac nurses, community nurses and primary care physical therapists), from June 2017 until October 2018. Qualitative data‐analysis is based on thematic analysis and integrated with quantitative key element outcomes. The analysis was blinded to trial outcomes. Fidelity was defined as the level of intervention adherence. Results The overall intervention fidelity was 67%, ranging from severely low fidelity in the consultation of in‐hospital geriatric teams (17%) to maximum fidelity in the comprehensive geriatric assessment (100%). Main themes of influence in the intervention performance that emerged from the interviews are interdisciplinary collaboration, organizational preconditions, confidence in the programme, time management and patient characteristics. In addition to practical issues, the patient's frailty status and limited motivation were barriers to the intervention. Conclusion Although involved healthcare professionals expressed their confidence in the intervention, the fidelity rate was suboptimal. This could have influenced the non‐significant effect of the CCB intervention on the primary composite outcome of readmission and mortality 6 months after randomization. Feasibility of intervention key elements should be reconsidered in relation to experienced barriers and the population. Impact In addition to insight in effectiveness, insight in intervention fidelity and performance is necessary to understand the mechanism of impact. This study demonstrates that the suboptimal fidelity was subject to a complex interplay of organizational, professionals' and patients' issues. The results support intervention redesign and inform future development of transitional care interventions in older cardiac patients.Keywords
Funding Information
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (023.008.024)
- ZonMw (520002002)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fidelity in complex behaviour change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrityBMJ Open, 2013
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: Reflections on the 2008 MRC guidanceInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2013
- Diagnoses and Timing of 30-Day Readmissions After Hospitalization for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, or PneumoniaJAMA, 2013
- Post-Hospital Syndrome — An Acquired, Transient Condition of Generalized RiskThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is an attractive alternative to no cardiac rehabilitation for elderly patients with coronary heart disease: results from a randomised clinical trialBMJ Open, 2012
- Protecting the power of interventions through proper reportingNursing Outlook, 2011
- The Importance Of Transitional Care In Achieving Health ReformHealth Affairs, 2011
- Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experienceInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care PhysiciansJAMA, 2007