Methodology for the American Society of Hematology VTE guidelines: current best practice, innovations, and experiences
Open Access
- 26 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood Advances
- Vol. 4 (10), 2351-2365
- https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001768
Abstract
Background: Methods for the development of clinical guidelines have advanced dramatically over the past 2 decades to strive for trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) have followed these advances, together with application of methodological innovations. Objective: In this article, we describe methods and methodological innovations as a model to inform future guideline enterprises by ASH and others to achieve guideline standards. Methodological innovations introduced in the development of the guidelines aim to address current challenges in guideline development. Methods: We followed ASH policy for guideline development, which is based on the Guideline International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and current best practices. Central coordination, specialist working groups, and expert panels were established for the development of 10 VTE guidelines. Methodological guidance resources were developed to guide the process across guidelines panels. A methods advisory group guided the development and implementation of methodological innovations to address emerging challenges and needs. Results: The complete set of VTE guidelines will include >250 recommendations. Methodological innovations include the use of health-outcome descriptors, online voting with guideline development software, modeling of pathways for diagnostic questions, application of expert evidence, and a template manuscript for publication of ASH guidelines. These methods advance guideline development standards and have already informed other ASH guideline projects. Conclusions: The development of the ASH VTE guidelines followed rigorous methods and introduced methodological innovations during guideline development, striving for the highest possible level of trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor.This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice GuidelinesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Do Clinical Marker States Improve Responsiveness and Construct Validity of the Standard Gamble and Feeling Thermometer: A Randomized Multi-Center Trial in Patients with Chronic Respiratory DiseaseQuality of Life Research, 2006
- A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Measurement Properties of 2 Direct Preference Instruments Administered with and without Hypothetical Marker StatesMedical Decision Making, 2003