Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches
- 4 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 13 (9), 1112-1122
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.233
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Peking Union Medical College
- Abbott Vascular
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can “true bifurcation lesion” actually be regarded as an independent risk factor of acute side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting?: A retrospective analysis of 1,200 consecutive bifurcation lesions in a single centerCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2016
- An Angiographic Tool for Risk Prediction of Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation InterventionJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2015
- Consideration of a New Definition of Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction After Coronary RevascularizationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013
- Predictors and Outcomes of Side Branch Occlusion After Main Vessel Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation LesionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013
- Incidence and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Small Side Branch Occlusion After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular ScaffoldJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2013
- A Modified Provisional Stenting Approach to Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Clinical Application of the “Jailed‐Balloon Technique”Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2012
- Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation LesionsCirculation, 2010
- Myocardial infarction adjudication in contemporary all-comer stent trials: balancing sensitivity and specificityEuroIntervention, 2010
- Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesionsEuropean Heart Journal, 2008
- Una clasificación simple de las lesiones coronarias en bifurcaciónRevista Espanola de Cardiologia, 2006