Sharing taxonomic expertise between natural history collections using image recognition
Open Access
- 1 March 2022
- journal article
- Published by Pensoft Publishers in Research Ideas and Outcomes
- Vol. 8, e79187
- https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e79187
Abstract
Natural history collections play a vital role in biodiversity research and conservation by providing a window to the past. The usefulness of the vast amount of historical data depends on their quality, with correct taxonomic identifications being the most critical. The identification of many of the objects of natural history collections, however, is wanting, doubtful or outdated. Providing correct identifications is difficult given the sheer number of objects and the scarcity of expertise. Here we outline the construction of an ecosystem for the collaborative development and exchange of image recognition algorithms designed to support the identification of objects. Such an ecosystem will facilitate sharing taxonomic expertise among institutions by offering image datasets that are correctly identified by their in-house taxonomic experts. Together with openly accessible machine learning algorithms and easy to use workbenches, this will allow other institutes to train image recognition algorithms and thereby compensate for the lacking expertise.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- The research data alliance: Implementing the technology, practice and connections of a data infrastructureBulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013
- ‘From Pilot to production’: Large Scale Digitisation project at Naturalis Biodiversity CenterZooKeys, 2012
- No specimen left behind: industrial scale digitization of natural history collectionsZooKeys, 2012
- Whole-drawer imaging for digital management and curation of a large entomological collectionZooKeys, 2012
- Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data StandardPLOS ONE, 2012
- The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity scienceBMC Bioinformatics, 2011
- Time to automate identificationNature, 2010
- Automated species identification: why not?Philosophical Transactions B, 2004
- Do experts make mistakes? A comparison of human and machine identification of dinoflagellatesMarine Ecology Progress Series, 2003
- Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservationAnimal Conservation, 2002