“Chilling Effect” in the Judicial Decisions of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal as an Example of a Legal Transplant
Open Access
- 10 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawla II in Review of European and Comparative Law
- Vol. 48 (1), 209-234
- https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.12857
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to describing the way of reception by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of the “chilling effect”, i.e. an institution related to such activities of public authorities that form an indirect act of deterrence regarding the execution of constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms, esp. the freedom of expression. The discussed concept has originated in judicial decisions of the US Supreme Court and has spread into many contemporary legal systems, including jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Although it is evident that the Tribunal “took over” that concept from the ECHR, it in fact developed its own, unfortunately internally inconsistent, understanding of the chilling effect. Four different ways of application of chilling effect may be noticed in judicial decisions of the Polish CT, while only two of them reflect the perception of this institution by the US Supreme Court and the ECHR. The paper is dedicated to describing the way of reception by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of the “chilling effect”, i.e. an institution related to such activities of public authorities that form an indirect act of deterrence regarding the execution of constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms, esp. the freedom of expression. The discussed concept has originated in judicial decisions of the US Supreme Court and has spread into many contemporary legal systems, including jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Although it is evident that the Tribunal “took over” that concept from the ECHR, it in fact developed its own, unfortunately internally inconsistent, understanding of the chilling effect. Four different ways of application of chilling effect may be noticed in judicial decisions of the Polish CT, while only two of them reflect the perception of this institution by the US Supreme Court and the ECHR.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chilling Effect as a European Court of Human Rights’ Concept in Media Law CasesBergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 2018
- The Freedom of the Judge to Express his Personal Opinions and Convictions under the ECHRUtrecht Law Review, 2017
- Comparative Constitutional ReasoningPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2017
- The ECHR and Human Rights TheoryPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2016
- PolandPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2016
- Is it Legitimate and Beneficial for Judges to Compare?Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2015
- Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme CourtsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2013
- Freedom of SpeechPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2007
- The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 1997
- The Chilling Effect in Constitutional LawColumbia Law Review, 1969