Combined Analysis of Concordance between Liquid and Tumor Tissue Biopsies for RAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer with a Single Metastasis Site: The METABEAM Study
- 18 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 27 (9), 2515-2522
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3677
Abstract
Background: OncoBEAMTM is a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test that uses the BEAMing digital polymerase chain reaction technology. We clarified the association between the baseline tumor burden and discordance in the RAS status by metastatic sites in patients with a single metastatic site. Patients and methods: Data from previous Spanish and Japanese studies investigating the concordance of the RAS status between OncoBEAMTM and tissue biopsy in 221 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were used. We collected data from patients with liver, peritoneal, or lung metastases and evaluated the concordance rates according to the metastatic site and the association between the concordance rate and tumor burden. Results: Patients had metastases in the liver (n=151), peritoneum (n=25), or lung (n=45) with concordance rates of 91% (95% confidence interval, 85-95%), 88% (68-97%), and 64% (49-78%), respectively. Factors associated with concordance included the baseline longest diameter and lesion number (P=0.004), and sample collection interval (P=0.036). Concordance rates {greater than or equal to}90% were observed in the following groups: liver metastases alone, regardless of the baseline longest diameter and lesion number; peritoneal metastases alone in patients with a baseline longest diameter {greater than or equal to}20 mm; and lung metastases alone in patients with a baseline longest diameter {greater than or equal to}20 mm and/or number of lesions {greater than or equal to}10. Conclusion: Plasma ctDNA-based liquid biopsy in patients with mCRC may be useful depending on the metastatic site. The maximum diameter and lesion number should be carefully considered when determining patients' RAS status with only peritoneal or lung metastases.Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patientsAnnals of Oncology, 2017
- Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancerAnnals of Oncology, 2017
- Blood‐based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti‐EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer patients: concordance of results from circulating tumor DNA and tissue‐based RAS testingMolecular Oncology, 2016
- Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patientsNature Medicine, 2015
- FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2015
- Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Treatment and RAS Mutations in Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2015
- Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human MalignanciesScience Translational Medicine, 2014
- Origin and quantification of circulating DNA in mice with human colorectal cancer xenograftsNucleic Acids Research, 2010
- Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamicsNature Medicine, 2008
- BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsionsNature Methods, 2006