Greenhouse gas implications of mobilizing agricultural biomass for energy: a reassessment of global potentials in 2050 under different food-system pathways
Open Access
- 15 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 15 (3), 034066
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2e
Abstract
Global bioenergy potentials have been the subject of extensive research and continued controversy. Due to vast uncertainties regarding future yields, diets and other influencing parameters, estimates of future agricultural biomass potentials vary widely. Most scenarios compatible with ambitious climate targets foresee a large expansion of bioenergy, mainly from energy crops that needs to be kept consistent with projections of agriculture and food production. Using the global biomass balance model BioBaM, we here present an assessment of agricultural bioenergy potentials compatible with FAO (2018) "Alternative pathways to 2050" projections. Mobilizing biomass at larger scales may be associated with systemic feedbacks causing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, e.g. crop residue removal resulting in loss of soil carbon stocks and increased emissions from fertilization. To assess these effects, we derive "GHG cost supply-curves", i.e. integrated representations of biomass potentials and their systemic GHG costs. Livestock manure is most favourable in terms of GHG costs, as anaerobic digestion yields reductions of GHG emissions from manure management. Global potentials from intensive livestock systems are about 5 EJ/yr. Crop residues can provide up to 20 EJ/yr at moderate GHG costs. For energy crops, we find that the medium range of literature estimates (⁓40-90 EJ/yr) is only compatible with FAO yield and human diet projections if energy plantations expand into grazing areas (⁓4-5 million km2) and grazing land is intensified globally. Direct carbon stock changes associated with perennial energy crops are beneficial for climate mitigation, yet there are – sometimes considerable – "opportunity GHG costs" if one accounts the foregone opportunity of afforestation. Our results indicate that the large potentials of energy crops foreseen in many energy scenarios are not freely and unconditionally available. Disregarding systemic effects in agriculture can result in misjudgement of GHG saving potentials and flawed climate mitigation strategies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Austrian Science Fund (P29130-G27)
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- The global tree restoration potentialScience, 2019
- Exploring potential socio-ecological impacts of changes to the Loliondo Gamed Controlled Area, Northern Tanzania: the case of the pastoral village OlolosokwanJournal of Land Use Science, 2016
- Wasteland energy-scapes: A comparative energy flow analysis of India’s biofuel and biomass economiesEcological Economics, 2014
- Agricultural residue production and potentials for energy and materials servicesProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2014
- Crop Residue Removal for Bioenergy Reduces Soil Carbon Pools: How Can We Offset Carbon Losses?BioEnergy Research, 2012
- Biomass for energy in the European Union - a review of bioenergy resource assessmentsBiotechnology for Biofuels, 2012
- Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applicationsEnvironmental Modelling & Software, 2011
- Crop Residue Removal Impacts on Soil Productivity and Environmental QualityCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2008
- Exploring changes in world ruminant production systemsAgricultural Systems, 2005
- The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studiesBiomass and Bioenergy, 2003