Beyond the Chair: Public Health and Governmental Measures to Tackle Sugar
- 6 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Dental Research
- Vol. 99 (8), 871-876
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520919333
Abstract
Limiting free sugars to <5% of energy intake is a World Health Organization evidence-based recommendation to protect oral health throughout the life course. Achieving this requires a concerted approach with upstream interventions, including legislation underpinning community interventions and health promotion. Global production and trade are the main drivers of sugars consumption, which can be addressed only through prioritization of health impacts in agricultural and trade agreements, including pricing and subsidies. Increasing evidence demonstrates the benefit, including dental benefits, of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages, a major source of sugars—with taxes based on sugars content being favored due to the dual impact in incentivizing consumers to buy less and encouraging producers to use less through product reformulation. A benefit of product reformulation is that the potential impact on sugars intake occurs independent of consumer behavior change, making the benefits more equitable across social groups. Evidence from meta-analysis indicates that sugars reformulation and portion size reduction could lower energy intake by more than 10% and 16%, respectively. Sophisticated and targeted digital marketing of products high in sugars is another key driver of sugars intake. With the exception of children’s television broadcasting, marketing of products high in sugars is largely unregulated, and increased awareness of modern marketing strategies and more stringent regulation are urgently needed. To ensure a commercial level playing field, mandatory approaches are required. Midstream actions include creating healthier food environments in neighborhoods, community settings (schools, sports centers, hospitals), and workplaces. Only through coalition among authorities responsible for planning and health will “obesogenic and cariogenic” environments be replaced with those that make healthy choices the easiest choice. It is recognized that providing nutrition health education alone is insufficient to achieve necessary sugars reduction; however, education has a key role to play in changing social norms and creating drive for change.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: Understanding the recent evidenceNutrition Reviews, 2014
- Synthesis and implications: China's nutrition transition in the context of changes across other low‐ and middle‐income countriesObesity Reviews, 2013
- How important is the choice of the nutrient profile model used to regulate broadcast advertising of foods to children? A comparison using a targeted data setEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2013
- Tackling the Global NCD Crisis: Innovations in Law and GovernanceThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2013
- Manufacturing Epidemics: The Role of Global Producers in Increased Consumption of Unhealthy Commodities Including Processed Foods, Alcohol, and TobaccoPLoS Medicine, 2012
- Where There Is No Health Research: What Can Be Done to Fill the Global Gaps in Health Research?PLoS Medicine, 2012
- Fast-Food Consumption and the Ban on Advertising Targeting Children: The Quebec ExperienceJournal of Marketing Research, 2011
- Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic reviewPublic Health Nutrition, 2011
- The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened BeveragesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Fast‐Food Restaurant Advertising on Television and Its Influence on Childhood ObesityThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2008