Comparison of Methods for Classifying Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms in Children
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 37 (13), 1504-1511
- https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6805
Abstract
Pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) has received increased public scrutiny over the past decade, especially for children who experience persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). However, several methods for defining PPCS exist in clinical and scientific literature, and even healthy children frequently exhibit non-specific, concussive-like symptoms. Inter-method agreement (six PPCS methods), observed misclassification rates, and other psychometric properties were examined in large cohorts of consecutively recruited adolescent pmTBI (N=162) one week and four months post-injury and in age/sex matched healthy controls (HC; N=117) at equivalent time intervals. Six published PPCS methods were stratified into simple (e.g., ICD-10) and standardized (e.g., reliable change indices) change algorithms. Among HC, test-retest reliability was fair to good across the four-month assessment window, with evidence of bias (i.e., higher symptom ratings) during retrospective relative to other assessments. Misclassification rates among HC were higher (>30%) for simple change algorithms, with poor inter-rater reliability of symptom burden across HC and their parents. A 49% spread existed in terms of the proportion of pmTBI “diagnosed” with PPCS at 4 months, with superior inter-method agreement amongst standardized change algorithms. In conclusion, the self-reporting of symptom burden is only modestly reliable in typically developing adolescents over a 4 month period, with additional evidence for systematic bias in both adolescent and parental ratings. Significant variation existed for identifying pmTBI who had “recovered” (i.e., those who did not meet individual criteria for PPCS) from concussion across the six definitions, representing a considerable challenge for estimating the true incidence rate of PPCS in published literature. Although relatively straight-forward to obtain, current findings question the utility of the most commonly used simple change scores for diagnosis of PPCS in clinical settings.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of Postconcussion Syndrome in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryPEDIATRICS, 2010
- Post-concussion Symptom Reporting and the "Good-Old-Days" Bias Following Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2010
- Which symptom assessments and approaches are uniquely appropriate for paediatric concussion?British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreementBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2008
- Postconcussional DisorderJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 2005
- Cumulative effects of concussion in amateur athletesBrain Injury, 2004
- Interpreting Change on ImPACT Following Sport ConcussionThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2003
- Methodological Commentary The Precision of Reliability and Validity Estimates Re-Visited: Distinguishing Between Clinical and Statistical Significance of Sample Size RequirementsJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2001
- Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information.Neuropsychology, 1993
- THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIALBiometrika, 1934