Propensity to use interoceptive signals: An important individual difference
- 31 March 2022
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Biological Psychology
- Vol. 171, 108326
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108326
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional frameworkBiological Psychology, 2022
- Sex-Specific Relationships Between Interoceptive Accuracy and Emotion RegulationFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2020
- Alexithymia is associated with a multidomain, multidimensional failure of interoception: Evidence from novel tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2018
- Interoception and emotionCurrent Opinion in Psychology, 2017
- Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysisCognition and Emotion, 2014
- Listening to Your HeartPsychological Science, 2010
- Toward a His and Hers Theory of Emotion: Gender Differences in Visceral PerceptionJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Blood pressure estimation and beliefs among normotensives and hypertensives.Health Psychology, 1988
- Accuracy of Perceiving Blood Glucose in IDDMDiabetes Care, 1985