Evaluation of Slug Refuge Traps in a Soybean Reduced-Tillage Cover Crop System
Open Access
- 12 January 2021
- Vol. 12 (1), 62
- https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010062
Abstract
As more farmers adopt no- or reduced-tillage and/or cover crop land management practices, slugs have become more frequent pests of field crops, including soybean. Monitoring slugs visually is difficult because they are nocturnal, so several trapping methods have been developed, though comparisons of trap types are rare. The objective of this study was to compare trapping efficiency of two types of slug refuge traps in reduced-tillage soybeans following cover crop termination. We tested a traditional shingle trap and a modified shingle trap with a water-filled pitfall trap beneath it. Traps were deployed in 24 pairs in 2018 and 2019 in experimental soybean plots. We counted slug captures weekly over a 5-week time period each year. In 2018, we counted the total number of slugs under each trap type. In 2019, counts were categorized into specific trap components (shingle vs. in/on/under the pitfall). Temperature was also recorded in 2019. The modified shingle traps captured significantly more slugs than the traditional shingle traps, mainly due to the pitfall component. This trend was most pronounced as slug density decreased, suggesting that the modified shingle trap is a more sensitive sampling tool which may be particularly valuable when used for research purposes.Keywords
Funding Information
- North Central Soybean Research Program (00056346)
- Ohio State University (n/a)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Daily variation in the number of slugs under refuge trapsAnnals of Applied Biology, 2003
- Simulation of moderate levels of slug injury to soybeanCrop Protection, 2000
- The Effect of Seedling Age on the Likelihood of Herbivory by the Slug Deroceras reticulatumFunctional Ecology, 1995
- Conservation tillage crop yields in relation to grey garden slug [Deroceras reticulatum (Müller)] (Mollusca: Agriolimacidae) density during establishmentCrop Protection, 1994
- Comparison between defined-area slug traps and other methods of trapping slugs in cereal fieldsCrop Protection, 1991
- Evaluation of defined‐area trapping for estimating the density of the field slug Deroceras reticulatum (Müller)Annals of Applied Biology, 1990
- Estimation of slug populationsAnnals of Applied Biology, 1964
- Inert dust insecticides: II. Field sampling for slugsAnnals of Applied Biology, 1944
- BAITING SLUGS USING METALDEHYDE MIXED WITH VARIOUS SUBSTANCESAnnals of Applied Biology, 1942
- ON The Ecology and Control of SlugsAnnals of Applied Biology, 1931