Discordances Between Factors Associated With Withholding Extubation and Extubation Failure After a Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trial*
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 49 (12), 2080-2089
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000005107
Abstract
Objectives: To identify whether factors associated with withholding extubation in the ICU also predict the risk of extubation failure. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Eight medical-surgical ICUs in Toronto. Patients: Adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, with a first successful spontaneous breathing trial within 28 days of initial ICU admission. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point had three mutually exclusive levels, including: 1) withholding extubation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, 2) extubation failure within 48 hours, and 3) successful extubation. Among 9,910 patients, 38% of patients were not extubated within 24 hours of their first successful spontaneous breathing trial. A total of 12.9% of patients who were promptly extubated failed within the next 48 hours. Several discrepancies were evident in the association of factors with risk of withholding extubation and extubation failure. Specifically, both age and female sex were associated with withholding extubation (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03–1.11; and odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02–1.26, respectively) but not a higher risk of failed extubation (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93–1.05; and odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77–1.11, respectively). Conversely, both acute cardiovascular conditions and intubation for hypoxemic respiratory failure were associated with a higher risk of failed extubation (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06–1.66; and odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16–1.82, respectively) but not a higher odds of a withheld extubation attempt (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68–0.91; and odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93–1.23, respectively). Conclusions: Several factors showed discordance between the decision to withhold extubation and the risk of extubation failure. This discordance may lead to longer duration of mechanical ventilation or higher reintubation rates. Improving the decision-making behind extubation may help to reduce both exposure to invasive mechanical ventilation and extubation failure.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Outcome of reintubated patients after scheduled extubationJournal of Critical Care, 2011
- Use of weaning protocols for reducing duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2011
- Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients in European ICUsCritical Care, 2009
- Weaning from mechanical ventilationEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2007
- Risk Factors for Extubation Failure in Patients Following a Successful Spontaneous Breathing TrialSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2006
- Decision to extubateIntensive Care Medicine, 2002
- Predictors of Extubation Outcome in Patients Who Have Successfully Completed a Spontaneous Breathing TrialSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2001
- A Comparison of Four Methods of Weaning Patients from Mechanical VentilationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Intensive Care, Survival, and Expense of Treating Critically III Cancer PatientsJAMA, 1993