Participatory Research for Environmental Justice: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis
- 1 February 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Environmental Health Perspectives in Environmental Health Perspectives
- Vol. 129 (2), 26001
- https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp6274
Abstract
Background: Environmental health risks are disproportionately colocated with communities in poverty and communities of color. In some cases, participatory research projects have effectively addressed structural causes of health risk in environmental justice (EJ) communities. However, many such projects fail to catalyze change at a structural level. Objectives: This review employs Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) to theorize specific elements of participatory research for environmental health that effectively prompt structural change in EJ communities. Methods: Academic database search was used to identify peer-reviewed literature describing participatory research with EJ communities to address environmental health. Synthetic constructs were developed iteratively related to study characteristics, design elements, and outcomes; and data were extracted for included records. Statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations between study design elements and structural change outcomes. Through critical, comparative, and contextual analyses of the “structural change” case study group and “non- structural change” group, informed by relevant theoretical literature, a synthesizing argument was generated. Results: From 505 total records identified, eligibility screening produced 232 case study articles, representing 154 case studies, and 55 theoretical articles for synthesis. Twenty-six case studies resulted in a structural change outcome. The synthesizing argument states that participatory research with EJ communities may be more likely to result in structural change when a) community members hold formal leadership roles; b) project design includes decision-makers and policy goals; and c) long term partnerships are sustained through multiple funding mechanisms. The assumption of EJ community benefit through research participation is critically examined. Discussion: Recommended future directions include establishing structural change as a goal of participatory research, employing participatory assessment of community benefit, and increased hiring of faculty of color at research institutions. The power, privilege, and political influence that academic institutions are able to leverage in partnership with EJ communities may be as valuable as the research itself. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6274This publication has 216 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reflexive Research Ethics for Environmental Health and Justice: Academics and Movement BuildingSocial Movement Studies, 2012
- Aligning the Goals of Community-Engaged ResearchAcademic Medicine, 2012
- Community First Communication: Reversing Information Disparities to Achieve Environmental JusticeEnvironmental Justice, 2010
- Sí Se Puede: Using Participatory Research to Promote Environmental Justice in a Latino Community in San Diego, CaliforniaJournal of Urban Health, 2010
- Community-Based Participatory Research in Indian CountryFamily & Community Health, 2010
- Community Organizing Network for Environmental Health: Using a Community Health Development Approach to Increase Community Capacity around Reduction of Environmental TriggersJournal of Prevention, 2010
- Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: an example using Critical Interpretive SynthesisJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2009
- Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USAJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008
- Participatory action researchJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Promoting Environmental Health Policy Through Community Based Participatory Research: A Case Study from Harlem, New YorkJournal of Urban Health, 2006