Evaluation of the role of sex as a prognostic factor in critically ill adults with sepsis: systematic review protocol
Open Access
- 6 May 2020
- Vol. 10 (5), e035927
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035927
Abstract
Introduction Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients. Recently, it has been recognised that sex may contribute to a differential risk for developing sepsis and it remains uncertain if the prognosis of sepsis varies between the sexes. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the available evidence to assess the role of sex as a prognostic factor in patients with sepsis managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods and analysis This is a systematic review protocol of prognostic studies of sex in patients with sepsis managed in the ICU. The primary outcomes include all-cause hospital mortality and all-cause hospital mortality during the first 28 days. The secondary outcomes include all-cause hospital mortality during the first 7 days and all-cause mortality at 1 year. We will conduct a search strategy based on the population (sepsis), the prognostic factor (sex), the outcome of interest (mortality) and prognostic study methods. We will search in the following databases up to December 2019: MEDLINE Ovid (from 1976), Embase Elsevier (from 1974), Web of Science and two trial registries. We will impose no language restrictions. Two authors will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles for eligibility of studies, and subsequently extract data. Two authors will independently assess the risk of bias of each study using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. If possible, we will carry out a meta-analysis to provide a pooled prognostic effect estimate for each outcome. We will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to assess the quality of evidence. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval will not be required. Findings from this review will be reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Additionally, the results will be disseminated at conferences and in the mass media. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019145054.Keywords
Funding Information
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CM18/00141, PIE16/00050)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Judging the quality of evidence in reviews of prognostic factor research: adapting the GRADE frameworkSystematic Reviews, 2013
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model ResearchPLoS Medicine, 2013
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor ResearchPLoS Medicine, 2013
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Appropriate Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for SepsisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2010
- Locating sex-specific evidence on clinical questions in MEDLINE: a search filter for use on OvidSP™BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Better science with sex and gender: Facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health researchInternational Journal for Equity in Health, 2009
- Alcohol dependence is independently associated with sepsis, septic shock, and hospital mortality among adult intensive care unit patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysisJAMA, 2006