Taking Eugenics Seriously: Three Generations of ??? are Enough?
Preprint
- 1 January 2003
- preprint
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
- Vol. 30 (2), 191-218
- https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.418102
Abstract
Recent media attention to the history of the eugenics movement in American has resulted in apologies from the governors of Virginia, Oregon, North Carolina, South Carolina and California for state mandated surgical sterilizations under eugenics laws. This article tracks the genesis of the eugenics apology movement, which began with a monument to the infamous case of Buck v. Bell that was erected just as heightened media coverage of milestones in human genome research filled the headlines. The article also explores the involvement of most early geneticists in the eugenics movement, attempting to put into historical context both the hopeful side of eugenics that made it so popular early in the 20th Century, as well as the dark memories we normally associate with eugenics in that era. The article draws parallels between the urge to eradicate disease embraced within the eugenics movement,and the similar urge often used to argue for new genetic technologies, such as prenatal genetic diagnosis.It is concluded with an echo of the Buck case, exhorting readers to avoid simplistic moralisms in reflecting on historic cases like Buck, in favor of a more searching analysis that would require us to understand our own eugenic impulses.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beaver, James Addams, (21 Oct. 1837–31 Jan. 1914)Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2007
- Inheriting Shame: The Story of Eugenics and Racism in America. Steven SeldenIsis, 2001
- Eugenics in Scandinavia after 1945: change of values and growth in knowledge.Scandinavian Journal of History, 1999
- Martin S. Pernick. The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of “Defective” Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures since 1915. New York: Oxford University Press. 1996. Pp. xv, 295The American Historical Review, 1998
- V.I.27 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (13 Jun 92) See Basic Document V.B.16, supraPublished by Brill ,1970
- The Paradoxes of FreedomThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1962
- 1916-1925Published by Harvard University Press ,1953
- A Rejoinder to Dr. DavenportScience, 1914
- HEREDITY AND EUGENICS.The Lancet, 1913