Assessing Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) carbon monoxide retrievals over urban versus non-urban regions
Open Access
- 23 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 13 (3), 1337-1356
- https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1337-2020
Abstract
The Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) retrievals over urban regions have not been validated systematically, even though MOPITT observations are widely used to study CO over urban regions. Here we compare MOPITT products over urban and non-urban regions with aircraft measurements from the Deriving Information on Surface conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations Relevant to Air Quality (DISCOVER-AQ – 2011–2014), Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds, and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS – 2013), Air Chemistry Research In Asia (ARIAs – 2016), A-FORCE (2009, 2013), and Korea United States Air Quality (KORUS-AQ – 2016) campaigns. In general, MOPITT agrees reasonably well with the in situ profiles, over both urban and non-urban regions. Version 8 multispectral product (V8J) biases vary from −0.7 % to 0.0 % and version 8 thermal-infrared product (TIR) biases vary from 2.0 % to 3.5 %. The evaluation statistics of MOPITT V8J and V8T over non-urban regions are better than those over urban regions with smaller biases and higher correlation coefficients. We find that the agreement of MOPITT V8J and V8T with aircraft measurements at high CO concentrations is not as good as that at low CO concentrations, although CO variability may tend to exaggerate retrieval biases in heavily polluted scenes. We test the sensitivities of the agreements between MOPITT and in situ profiles to assumptions and data filters applied during the comparisons of MOPITT retrievals and in situ profiles. The results at the surface layer are insensitive to the model-based profile extension (required due to aircraft altitude limitations), whereas the results at levels with limited aircraft observations (e.g., the 600 hPa layer) are more sensitive to the model-based profile extension. The results are insensitive to the maximum allowed time difference criterion for co-location (12, 6, 3, and 1 h) and are generally insensitive to the radius for co-location, except for the case where the radius is small (25 km), and hence few MOPITT retrievals are included in the comparison. Daytime MOPITT products have smaller overall biases than nighttime MOPITT products when comparing both MOPITT daytime and nighttime retrievals to the daytime aircraft observations. However, it would be premature to draw conclusions on the performance of MOPITT nighttime retrievals without nighttime aircraft observations. Applying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) filters does not necessarily improve the overall agreement between MOPITT retrievals and in situ profiles, likely due to the reduced number of MOPITT retrievals for comparison. Comparisons of MOPITT retrievals and in situ profiles over complex urban or polluted regimes are inherently challenging due to spatial and temporal variabilities of CO within MOPITT retrieval pixels (i.e., footprints). We demonstrate that some of the errors are due to CO representativeness with these sensitivity tests, but further quantification of representativeness errors due to CO variability within the MOPITT footprint will require future work.Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (1852977)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (70NANB14H332)
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- A study of regional-scale variability of in situ and model-generated tropospheric trace gases: Insights into observational requirements for a satellite in geostationary orbitAtmospheric Environment, 2011
- Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4)Geoscientific Model Development, 2010
- Carbon monoxide pollution from cities and urban areas observed by the Terra/MOPITT missionGeophysical Research Letters, 2008
- Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE‐P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxidePublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,2004
- Validation of Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) CO retrievals with aircraft in situ profilesPublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,2004
- Top‐down estimates of global CO sources using MOPITT measurementsGeophysical Research Letters, 2004
- Operational carbon monoxide retrieval algorithm and selected results for the MOPITT instrumentJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Radiative transfer modeling for the EOS Terra satellite Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrumentPublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,1999
- Retrieval of tropospheric carbon monoxide for the MOPITT experimentPublished by American Geophysical Union (AGU) ,1998
- The Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) Instrument: Overall Performance and Calibration RequirementsJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1996