Inoculating against the spread of Islamophobic and radical-Islamist disinformation
Open Access
- 19 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
- Vol. 6 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00323-z
Abstract
We report the results of a preregistered study that tested the effectiveness of inoculating participants against Islamophobic and radical-Islamist disinformation. Participants in the experimental (inoculation) condition watched a video that explained common rhetorical markers of radical-Islamist and Islamophobic disinformation that had been identified in an analysis of YouTube content. The information was presented in a neutral context not involving Islam and focused on analysis of the misleading argumentation. The control group watched a video about an unrelated topic. Participants were then exposed to target videos with “gateway” content that constituted an entry point to potential Islamist or Islamophobic radicalization. Both videos contained numerous items of disinformation. Participants then answered a variety of questions such as how likely they were to share the video, their level of agreement, and their perceived accuracy of the video. Participants who had received the inoculation displayed less agreement with the video content, perceived the video as less reliable, and were less likely to share it in comparison with participants in the control group. The study provides support for the use of argument-based inoculation in combatting extremist messages.Keywords
Funding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council (via CREST at University of Lancaster)
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Research Award)
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The symbiotic relationship between Islamophobia and radicalisationCritical Studies on Terrorism, 2012
- Inoculation's Efficacy With Young Adults' Risky Behaviors: Can Inoculation Confer Cross-Protection Over Related but Untreated Issues?Health Communication, 2012
- The problem with ‘radicalization’: the remit of ‘Prevent’ and the need to refocus on terrorism in the UKInternational Affairs, 2011
- A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation TheoryCommunication Monographs, 2010
- Failed and Friendless: The UK's ‘Preventing Violent Extremism’ ProgrammeThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2010
- Fully Committed: Suicide Bombers' Motivation and the Quest for Personal SignificancePolitical Psychology, 2009
- Media Coverage of the Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism Controversy and Its Relationship to MMR Immunization Rates in the United StatesPEDIATRICS, 2008
- A taxonomy of reasoning flaws in the anti-vaccine movementVaccine, 2007
- The Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychological Exploration.American Psychologist, 2005
- Fear Appeals Motivate Acceptance of Action Recommendations: Evidence for a Positive Bias in the Processing of Persuasive MessagesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003