Socially distanced, virtually connected: Faculty and resident perceptions of virtual didactics
- 19 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in AEM Education and Training
- Vol. 5 (3), e10617
- https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10617
Abstract
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency medicine (EM) residency programs have transitioned from traditional in-person to virtual synchronous didactics to comply with social distancing guidelines. This study explores the perceptions of EM residents and faculty regarding this new virtual format. Methods This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study at five EM residencies using a mixed-methods approach to investigate resident and faculty perceptions of virtual didactics. Institutions selected reflect different program lengths and geographic locations. Quantitative data measured on a Likert scale were summarized as percentages. Differences were calculated using Welch’s t-test and chi-square, where p<.05 was significant. Open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively. Results Our response rate was 64% (n=141) for residents and 48% (n=108) for faculty. Fifty-one percent of faculty and 54% of residents felt that they are more likely to attend virtually than in-person. Among residents, 77% felt that they are more likely to attend virtual conferences during vacation or elective rotations. Perceived retention of information from virtual sessions was perceived to be the same or better for 69% of residents and 58% of faculty. Residents felt they paid more attention in the virtual format (29% vs. 26%, p=.037). Both groups missed the social interactions of in-person conference (86% of faculty, 75% of residents). Respondents from both groups felt that <20% of total didactic time should remain virtual once social distancing recommendations are lifted. Qualitative analysis revealed recommendations from residents and faculty to optimize lecture style and interactivity. Decreased commute time and ability to multitask at home increased wellness for both groups. Conclusions While benefits of virtual didactics were acknowledged, residents and faculty missed the social interaction of in-person conference and preferred <20% of future didactics to be virtual. Further research should assess the difference in knowledge acquisition and retention between conference models.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Medicine Residency Curricular Innovations: Creating a Virtual Emergency Medicine Didactic ConferenceAEM Education and Training, 2020
- Rethinking Residency Conferences in the Era of COVID‐19AEM Education and Training, 2020
- The ALiEM Faculty Incubator: A Novel Online Approach to Faculty Development in Education ScholarshipAcademic Medicine, 2018
- Trends in National Emergency Medicine Conference Didactic Lectures Over a 6-Year PeriodJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2017
- Number Needed to Meet: Ten Strategies for Improving Resident Networking OpportunitiesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2016
- Alternatives to the Conference Status Quo: Addressing the Learning Needs of Emergency Medicine ResidentsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2016
- Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociationEducation and Information Technologies, 2014
- Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health researchBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- You Can't Fix by Analysis What You've Spoiled by Design: Developing Survey Instruments and Collecting Validity EvidenceJournal of Graduate Medical Education, 2012
- E-mail Survey Response Rates: A ReviewJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2006