Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
Open Access
- 2 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in BJPsych Open
- Vol. 7 (4), e123
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.953
Abstract
Background The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used measure of depression in primary care. It was, however, originally designed as a diagnostic screening tool, and not for measuring change in response to antidepressant treatment. Although the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR-16) has been extensively validated for outcome measurement, it is poorly adopted in UK primary care, and, although free for clinicians, has licensing restrictions for healthcare organisation use. Aims We aimed to develop a modified version of the PHQ-9, the Maudsley Modified PHQ-9 (MM-PHQ-9), for tracking symptom changes in primary care. We tested the measure's validity, reliability and factor structure. Method A sample of 121 participants was recruited across three studies, and comprised 78 participants with major depressive disorder and 43 controls. MM-PHQ-9 scores were compared with the QIDS-SR-16 and Clinical Global Impressions improvement scale, for concurrent validity. Internal consistency of the scale was assessed, and principal component analysis was conducted to determine the items’ factor structure. Results The MM-PHQ-9 demonstrated good concurrent validity with the QIDS-SR-16, and excellent internal consistency. Sensitivity to change over a 14-week period was d = 0.41 compared with d = 0.61 on the QIDS-SR-16. Concurrent validity between the paper and mobile app versions of the MM-PHQ-9 was r = 0.67. Conclusions These results indicate that the MM-PHQ-9 is a valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms in paper and mobile app format, although further validation is required. The measure was sensitive to change, demonstrating suitability for use in routine outcome assessment.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The factor structure of major depression symptoms: A test of four competing models using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9Psychiatry Research, 2012
- Measurement invariance with respect to ethnicity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)Journal of Affective Disorders, 2011
- Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysisClinical Psychology Review, 2010
- Using the patient health questionnaire-9 to measure depression among racially and ethnically diverse primary care patientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Has the Gold Standard Become a Lead Weight?American Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- Change in Symptomatology of Melancholic Depression over Two DecadesPsychopathology, 1995
- Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- A Comparison of Depression Rating ScalesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978
- QUANTITATIVE RATING OF DEPRESSIVE STATESActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1975