Institutionalizing ethics in AI through broader impact requirements
- 17 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature Machine Intelligence
- Vol. 3 (2), 104-110
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00298-y
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Funding provided by the Institute for Ethics in AI and the Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.
- Funding provided by the Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford.
- RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S005099/1)
- Employed by DeepMind until June 2020.
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer Science Security Research and Human Subjects: Emerging Considerations for Research Ethics BoardsJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2011
- A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature Evaluating IRBs: What We Know and What We Still Need to LearnJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2011
- Institutional review boards - a mixed blessingInternational Archives of Medicine, 2011
- Broad Impacts and Narrow Perspectives: Passing the Buck on Science and Social ImpactsSocial Epistemology, 2009
- Investigating Perceived Institutional Review Board Quality and Function Using the IRB Researcher Assessment ToolJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2008
- Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From WithinBulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2006
- What Scientists Want from Their Research Ethics CommitteeJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2006
- Institutional Review Boards: Changing with the Times?Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2000
- A review of the quality of environmental impact assessments in the Scottish forest sectorForestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 1999
- Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986