Development of a clinical prediction rule for sepsis in primary care: protocol for the TeSD-IT study
Open Access
- 6 August 2020
- journal article
- protocol
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
- Vol. 4 (1), 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-00080-5
Abstract
Early recognition and treatment of sepsis is crucial to prevent detrimental outcomes. General practitioners (GPs) are often the first healthcare providers to encounter seriously ill patients. The aim of this study is to assess the value of clinical information and additional tests to develop a clinical prediction rule to support early diagnosis and management of sepsis by GPs. We will perform a diagnostic study in the setting of out-of-hours home visits in four GP cooperatives in the Netherlands. Acutely ill adult patients suspected of a serious infection will be screened for eligibility by the GP. The following candidate predictors will be prospectively recorded: (1) age, (2) body temperature, (3) systolic blood pressure, (4) heart rate, (5) respiratory rate, (6) peripheral oxygen saturation, (7) mental status, (8) history of rigors, and (9) rate of progression. After clinical assessment by the GP, blood samples will be collected in all patients to measure C-reactive protein, lactate, and procalcitonin. All patients will receive care as usual. The primary outcome is the presence or absence of sepsis within 72 h after inclusion, according to an expert panel. The need for hospital treatment for any indication will be assessed by the expert panel as a secondary outcome. Multivariable logistic regression will be used to design an optimal prediction model first and subsequently derive a simplified clinical prediction rule that enhances feasibility of using the model in daily clinical practice. Bootstrapping will be performed for internal validation of both the optimal model and simplified prediction rule. Performance of both models will be compared to existing clinical prediction rules for sepsis. This study will enable us to develop a clinical prediction rule for the recognition of sepsis in a high-risk primary care setting to aid in the decision which patients have to be immediately referred to a hospital and who can be safely treated at home. As clinical signs and blood samples will be obtained prospectively, near-complete data will be available for analyses. External validation will be needed before implementation in routine care and to determine in which pre-hospital settings care can be improved using the prediction rule. The study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (registration number NTR7026).Keywords
Other Versions
Funding Information
- ZonMw (843001811)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combining qSOFA criteria with initial lactate levels: Improved screening of septic patients for critical illnessThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2019
- Combining procalcitonin with the qSOFA and sepsis mortality predictionMedicine, 2019
- Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteriaStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2018
- Biomarkers in SepsisCritical Care Clinics, 2018
- Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority — A WHO ResolutionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)JAMA, 2016
- Diagnostic and prognostic markers in sepsisExpert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2013
- Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)markerHeart, 2012
- The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failureIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in SepsisSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 1992