Harm minimisation for the management of self-harm: a mixed-methods analysis of electronic health records in secondary mental healthcare
Open Access
- 25 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in BJPsych Open
- Vol. 7 (4), e116
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.946
Abstract
Background Prevalence of self-harm in the UK was reported as 6.4% in 2014. Despite sparse evidence for effectiveness, guidelines recommend harm minimisation; a strategy in which people who self-harm are supported to do so safely. Aims To determine the prevalence, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of those who self-harm and practise harm minimisation within a London mental health trust. Method We included electronic health records for patients treated by South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. Using an iterative search strategy, we identified patients who practise harm minimisation, then classified the approaches using a content analysis. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics with that of a control group of patients who self-harm and do not use harm minimisation. Results In total 22 736 patients reported self-harm, of these 693 (3%) had records reporting the use of harm-minimisation techniques. We coded the approaches into categories: (a) ‘substitution’ (>50% of those using harm minimisation), such as using rubber bands or using ice; (b) ‘simulation’ (9%) such as using red pens; (c) ‘defer or avoid’ (7%) such as an alternative self-injury location; (d) ‘damage limitation’ (9%) such as using antiseptic techniques; the remainder were unclassifiable (24%). The majority of people using harm minimisation described it as helpful (>90%). Those practising harm minimisation were younger, female, of White ethnicity, had previous admissions and were less likely to have self-harmed with suicidal intent. Conclusions A small minority of patients who self-harm report using harm minimisation, primarily substitution techniques, and the large majority find harm minimisation helpful. More research is required to determine the acceptability and effectiveness of harm-minimisation techniques and update national clinical guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Creative EdgeQualitative Health Research, 2015
- Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Repeated Suicidal and Self-harming Behavior: A Randomized TrialJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2014
- Self-injury and harm minimisation on acute wardsNursing Standard, 2012
- Self-harm and the positive risk taking approach. Can being able to think about the possibility of harm reduce the frequency of actual harm?Journal of Mental Health, 2011
- ‘Change can only be a good thing:’ staff views on the introduction of a harm minimisation policy in a Forensic Learning Disability serviceBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2011
- Self-harm – The solution not the problem: The Dialectical Behaviour Therapy ModelPsychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 2010
- Self-harm in adolescent in-patientsPsychiatric Bulletin, 2009
- Nonsuicidal Self-Harm Among Community Adolescents: Understanding the “Whats” and “Whys” of Self-HarmJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 2005
- Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1999