Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Vol. 85 (4), 473-482
- https://doi.org/10.1086/656904
Abstract
The concept of Irreducible Complexity (IC) has played a pivotal role in the resurgence of the creationist movement over the past two decades. Evolutionary biologists and philosophers have unambiguously rejected the purported demonstration of “intelligent design” in nature, but there have been several, apparently contradictory, lines of criticism. We argue that this is in fact due to Michael Behe's own incoherent definition and use of IC. This paper offers an analysis of several equivocations inherent in the concept of Irreducible Complexity and discusses the way in which advocates of the Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC) have conveniently turned IC into a moving target. An analysis of these rhetorical strategies helps us to understand why IC has gained such prominence in the IDC movement, and why, despite its complete lack of scientific merits, it has even convinced some knowledgeable persons of the impending demise of evolutionary theory.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Human Function Compunction: Teleological explanation in adultsCognition, 2009
- Evidence and EvolutionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Biochemistry by designTrends in Biochemical Sciences, 2007
- From The Origin of Species to the origin of bacterial flagellaNature Reviews Microbiology, 2006
- Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?Psychological Science, 2004
- The evolutionary origin of complex featuresNature, 2003
- Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to EvolutionBiology & Philosophy, 2001
- Redundant Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in BiochemistryPhilosophy of Science, 1999