Specifying Challenges in Transcribing Covert Recordings: Implications for Forensic Transcription
Open Access
- 22 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Communication
Abstract
Covert audio recordings feature in the criminal justice system in a variety of guises, either on their own or accompanied by video. If legally obtained, such recordings can provide important forensic evidence. However, the quality of these potentially valuable evidential recordings is often very poor and their content indistinct, to the extent that a jury requires an accompanying transcript. At present, in many international jurisdictions, these transcriptions are produced by investigating police officers involved in the case, but transcription is a highly complex, meticulous and onerous task, and police officers are untrained and have a vested interest in the influence of the transcript on a case, which gives rise to potential inaccuracy. This paper reports the design and results of a controlled transcription experiment in which eight linguistically trained professional transcribers produced transcripts for an audio recording of a conversation between five adults in a busy restaurant. In the context of covert recordings, this recording shares many of the typical features of covert forensic recordings, including the presence of multiple speakers, background noise and use of non-specialist recording equipment. We present a detailed qualitative and quantitative comparison of the transcripts, identifying areas of agreement and disagreement in (a) speaker attribution and (b) the representation of the linguistic content. We find that disagreement between the transcriptions is frequent and various in nature; the most common causes are identified as (i) omission of speech that is included in other transcripts, (ii) variation in the representation of turns, (iii) orthographic variation seemingly motivated by phonetic similarity, and (iv) orthographic variation seemingly not motivated by phonetic similarity. We argue that the variable nature of the transcription of “challenging” audio recordings must be considered in forensic contexts and make recommendations for improving practice in the production of forensic transcriptions.Funding Information
- Aston University
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working with Transcripts: An Abridged Review of Issues in TranscriptionLanguage and Linguistics Compass, 2013
- Interpretation of a Crisis Call: Persistence of a primed perception of a disputed utteranceInternational Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 2011
- Captured on tape: professional hearing and competing entextualizations in the criminal justice systemText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 2009
- Variation in transcriptionDiscourse Studies, 2007
- Issues in transcription: factors affecting the reliability of transcripts as evidence in legal casesInternational Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 2003
- Introduction: Non‐standard orthography and non‐standard speechJournal of Sociolinguistics, 2000
- Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of Technique to Interpretive PositioningsQualitative Inquiry, 1999
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Estimating the Reliability, Systematic Error and Random Error of Interval DataEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between SpeciesEcology, 1945