Discursive violence and responsibility
- 2 October 2015
- journal article
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company in Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
- Vol. 3 (1), 200-228
- https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.09lee
Abstract
This article discusses the discursive strategies of the Freedom Party (PVV), a contemporary Dutch populist and Islamophobic party. After tracing its ideological roots to mainstream liberalism rather than earlier forms of extreme right political movements, I will discuss its discourse about Muslims. It will appear that this discourse goes far beyond the legitimate expression of opinion. Using some of Judith Butler’s ideas about the performativity of hate speech, I will attempt to describe how PVV leader Geert Wilders’s language is not only a discourseaboutviolence, but is also itself a discourseofviolence. Simultaneously, however, Wilders systematically denied responsibility for any violence his words might contain, imply, or provoke; instead, he and his sympathizers blamed both Muslims and his political opponents for whatever violence might occur in the wake of his utterances. This appears most clearly in the discussion following Norwegian Anders Breivik’s murderous 2011 assault on the Utøya island, an act which he himself claimed was in part inspired by Wilders’s political rhetoric.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chapter 6. Free speech, hate speech, and hate beardsPublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,2017
- Anders Breivik and The Rise of IslamophobiaPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,2014
- The Harm in Hate SpeechPublished by Harvard University Press ,2012
- The Content and Context of Hate SpeechPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2012
- Making the Social WorldPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2010