Discrimination of Breast Cancer from Healthy Breast Tissue Using a Three-component Diffusion-weighted for MRI Model
- 3 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 27 (4), 1094-1104
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2017
Abstract
Purpose: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a contrast-free modality that has demonstrated ability to discriminate between predefined benign and malignant breast lesions. However, how well DW-MRI discriminates cancer from all other breast tissue voxels in a clinical setting is unknown. Here we explore the voxelwise ability to distinguish cancer from healthy breast tissue using signal contributions from the newly developed three-component multi-b-value DW-MRI model. Experimental Design: Patients with pathology-proven breast cancer from two datasets (n = 81 and n = 25) underwent multi-b-value DW-MRI. The three-component signal contributions C-1 and C-2 and their product, C1C2 , and signal fractions F-1, F-2, and F1F2 were compared with the image defined on maximum b-value (DWImax), conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and apparent diffusion kurtosis (K-app). The ability to discriminate between cancer and healthy breast tissue was assessed by the false-positive rate given a sensitivity of 80% (FPR80) and ROC AUC. Results: Mean FPR80 for both datasets was 0.016 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.024] for C1C2, 0.136 (95% CI, 0.092-0.180) for C-1,0.068 (95% CI, 0.049-0.087) for C-2, 0.462 (95% CI, 0.425-0.499) for F1F2, 0.832 (95% CI, 0.797-0.868) for F-1,0.176 (95% CI, 0.150-0.203) for F-2, 0.159 (95% CI, 0.114-0.204) for DWImax, 0.731 (95% CI, 0.692-0.770) for ADC, and 0.684 (95% Cl, 0.660-0.709) for K-app. Mean ROC AUC for C1C2 was 0.984 (95% CI, 0.977-0.991). Conclusions: The C1C2 parameter of the three-component model yields a clinically useful discrimination between cancer and healthy breast tissue, superior to other DW-MRI methods and obliviating predefining lesions. This novel DW-MRI method may serve as noncontrast alternative to standard-of-care dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Other Versions
Funding Information
- California Breast Cancer Screening Program (25IB-0056)
- NIH NIBIB (K08EB026503)
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diffusion-weighted MRI: influence of intravoxel fat signal and breast density on breast tumor conspicuity and apparent diffusion coefficient measurementsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2011
- Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesionsBMC Cancer, 2010
- American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast CancerJournal of Oncology Practice, 2010
- Efficient correction of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced distortion in Echo Planar ImagingNeuroImage, 2010
- Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficientNMR in Biomedicine, 2010
- Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5‐TJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2009
- Mammography, Breast Ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Women at High Familial Risk for Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Malignant Breast TumorsJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2005
- Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005
- Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imagingCancer, 2005