Choosing Impairment: Conflicting Interests
Open Access
- 25 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Queensland University of Technology in QUT Law Review
- Vol. 18 (2), 229-245
- https://doi.org/10.5204/qutlr.v18i2.769
Abstract
The integration of reproductive genetic testing into clinical care presents both opportunities and challenges for parents in regards to shaping the lives of their future children. The relationship between parents and their future children has become more complex and new questions are being raised in relation to the extent of parental responsibility to future generations. This paper explores the ethical permissibility of using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select for impairment, through the use of two case studies involving identity-affecting decisions. Through analysing harm using both a personal and impersonal approach, it is concluded that if a couple, or single reproducer, have a choice between an impaired and healthy embryo, and that the same number of children would result from selection, there is a moral obligation for parents to select the ones which will have an acceptable level of interest fulfilment and a normal opportunity for health.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic diseaseSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2014
- Parental duties and prenatal screening: Does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?Midwifery, 2012
- Balancing Procreative Autonomy and Parental ResponsibilityCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2011
- Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2010
- Choosing Deafness with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Ethical Way to Carry on a Cultural Bloodline?Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2009
- THE MORAL OBLIGATION TO CREATE CHILDREN WITH THE BEST CHANCE OF THE BEST LIFEBioethics, 2009
- Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicineNature Reviews Genetics, 2008
- Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinicsFertility and Sterility, 2008
- Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection"Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004