Consent and Privacy in the Era of Precision Medicine and Biobanking Genomic Data
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Journal of Law & Medicine
- Vol. 46 (2-3), 167-187
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858820933493
Abstract
“Big Data represents a challenge that points to the need for collective and political approaches to self-protection rather than solely individual, atomistic approaches.” – Anita Allen, “Protecting One's Own Privacy in a Big Data Economy”Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname InferenceScience, 2013
- Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: Is passive participation an ethical problem?European Journal of Human Genetics, 2013
- The Tension Between Data Sharing and the Protection of Privacy in Genomics ResearchAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2012
- iDASH: integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2012
- Informed Consent in Genomics and Genetic ResearchAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2010
- Identifiability of DNA Data: The Need for Consistent Federal PolicyAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2008
- Whole-Genome Data Not Anonymous, Challenging AssumptionsScience, 2008
- The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic BiobanksAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2007
- Comparative Law. Genetic Privacy. Icelandic Supreme Court Holds That Inclusion of an Individual's Genetic Information in a National Database Infringes on the Privacy Interests of His Child. Gudmundsdottir v. Iceland, no. 151/2003 (Nov. 27, 2003) (Ice.)Harvard Law Review, 2004
- The Santa Cruz Workshop—May 1985Genomics, 1989