How adequate is measles surveillance in the United States? Investigations of measles-like illness, 2010–2017
- 3 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
- Vol. 17 (3), 698-704
- https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1798712
Abstract
Given the availability of an effective and safe vaccine, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that global measles eradication is achievable, and measles elimination goals have since been established as interim steps toward eradication. As part of a strategy to maintain elimination, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and WHO stipulate a minimum annual reporting rate of discarded non-measles cases of ≥2 per 100,000 population, in order to ensure sensitive surveillance and adequate investigative effort. With its effective vaccination program, the United States in 2000 was among the first countries to verify elimination, although subsequently, it has not routinely reported discarded rates. We estimated MLI investigation rates among insured individuals during 2010–2017, using data from the MarketScan® databases. We defined “MLI investigations” as measles serologic testing within 5 days following diagnostic codes for measles-compatible symptoms and conditions. We provide a rationale for pre-specifying three subgroups for analysis: children aged ≤15 years; males aged 16–22 years excluding data from summer months; and males aged ≥23 years. MLI investigation rates ranged from 6.6─26.4 per 100,000, remaining stable over time except during the 2015 measles outbreaks when rates increased, particularly among young children. In addition to high vaccine uptake, measles elimination requires ongoing vigilance by clinicians and high-quality, case-based surveillance. Estimated rates of MLI investigations in this U.S. population suggesting that the quality of measles surveillance is sufficiently sensitive to detect endemic measles circulation if it were to be occurring.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uses of Electronic Health Records for Public Health Surveillance to Advance Public HealthAnnual Review of Public Health, 2015
- Guidelines for the Documentation and Verification of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome Elimination in the Region of the AmericasThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2011
- Administrative Data Sets and Health Services Research on Hemoglobinopathies: A Review of the LiteratureAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2010
- Adequacy of Surveillance to Detect Endemic Rubella Transmission in the United StatesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Syndromic Surveillance for Measleslike Illnesses in a Managed Care SettingThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Lessons Learned from Establishing and Evaluating Indicators of the Quality of Measles Surveillance in the United States, 1996–1998The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Can a Minimum Rate of Investigation of Measleslike Illnesses Serve as a Standard for Evaluating Measles Surveillance?The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Measles Surveillance in 5 Major US Cities: Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, and New YorkThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Statewide System of Electronic Notifiable Disease Reporting From Clinical LaboratoriesJAMA, 1999
- Eradication of Wild Poliovirus from the Americas: Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance, 1988-1995The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1997