Removing hospital-based triage from suspected colorectal cancer pathways: the impact and learning from a primary care-led electronic straight-to-test pathway
- 11 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
- Vol. 30 (6), 467-474
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009975
Abstract
Background The 2-week wait referral pathway for suspected colorectal cancer was introduced in England to improve time from referral from a general practitioner (GP) to diagnosis and treatment. Patients are required to be seen by a hospital clinician within 2 weeks if their symptoms meet the criteria set by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and to start cancer treatment within 62 days. To achieve this, many hospitals have introduced a straight-to-test (STT) strategy requiring hospital-based triage of referrals. We describe the impact and learning from a new pathway which has removed triage and moved the process of requesting tests from hospital to GPs in primary care. Method An electronic STT pathway was introduced allowing GPs to book tests supported by a decision aid based on NICE guidance eliminating the need for a standard referral form or triage process. The hospital identified referrals as being on a cancer pathway and dealt with all ongoing management. Routinely collected cancer data were used to identify time to cancer diagnosis compared with national data Results 11357 patients were referred via the new pathway over 3 years. Time from referral to diagnosis reduced from 39 to 21 days and led to a dramatic improvement in patients starting treatment within 62 days. Challenges included adapting to a change in referral criteria and developing a robust hospital system to monitor the pathway. Conclusion We have changed the way patients with suspected colorectal cancer are managed within the National Health Service by giving GPs the ability to order tests electronically within a monitored cancer pathway halving time from referral to diagnosisKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic review with meta‐analysis of over 90 000 patients. Does fast‐track review diagnose colorectal cancer earlier?Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2019
- Straight-to-test for the two-week-wait colorectal cancer pathway under the updated NICE guidelines reduces time to cancer diagnosis and treatmentThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2019
- The effect of time from diagnosis to surgery on oncological outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer: A systematic reviewEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2018
- Straight‐to‐test colonoscopy for 2‐week‐wait referrals improves time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer and is feasible in a high‐volume unitColorectal Disease, 2017
- The “two-week wait” referral pathway is not associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal cancerInternational Journal of Surgery, 2017
- Has the 'Fast-Track' referral system affected the route of presentation and/or clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer?World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2016
- Colorectal cancer screening characteristics of patients presenting with symptoms of colorectal cancer and effect on clinical outcomesThe Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2015
- The 2‐week wait referral system does not improve 5‐year colorectal cancer survivalColorectal Disease, 2012
- The impact of the two‐week wait referral pathway on rectal cancer survivalColorectal Disease, 2011
- Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2‐week wait referral systemColorectal Disease, 2006