How big is your bubble? Characteristics of self-isolating household units (‘bubbles’) during the COVID-19 Alert Level 4 period in New Zealand: a cross-sectional survey
Open Access
- 28 January 2021
- Vol. 11 (1), e042464
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042464
Abstract
Objective To characterise the self-isolating household units (bubbles) during the COVID-19 Alert Level 4 lockdown in New Zealand. Design, setting and participants In this cross-sectional study, an online survey was distributed to a convenience sample via Facebook advertising and the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand’s social media platforms and mailing list. Respondents were able to share a link to the survey via their own social media platforms and by email. Results were collected over 6 days during Alert Level 4 from respondents living in New Zealand, aged 16 years and over. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was the mean size of a self-isolating household unit or bubble. Secondary outcomes included the mean number of households in each bubble, the proportion of bubbles containing essential workers and/or vulnerable people, and the mean number of times the home was left each week. Results 14 876 surveys were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) bubble size was 3.58 (4.63) people, with mean (SD) number of households 1.26 (0.77). The proportion of bubbles containing one or more essential workers, or one or more vulnerable persons was 45.3% and 42.1%, respectively. The mean number of times individual bubble members left their home in the previous week was 12.9 (12.4). Bubbles that contained at least one vulnerable individual had fewer outings over the previous week compared with bubbles that did not contain a vulnerable person. The bubble sizes were similar by respondent ethnicity. Conclusion In this New Zealand convenience sample, bubble sizes were small, mostly limited to one household, and a high proportion contained essential workers and/or vulnerable people. Understanding these characteristics from a country which achieved a low COVID-19 infection rate may help inform public health interventions during this and future pandemics.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Public Health Interventions With the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, ChinaJAMA, 2020
- Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in ChinaJAMA, 2020
- The Spanish Influenza Pandemic: a lesson from history 100 years after 1918.2019
- The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2017
- Effects of oral montelukast on airway function in acute asthma: A randomized trialLung India, 2017
- Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic reviewInternet Interventions, 2016
- Differential Mortality Rates by Ethnicity in 3 Influenza Pandemics Over a Century, New ZealandEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Hospitalizations for Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among Maori and Pacific Islanders, New ZealandEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008
- Public health and ethical considerations in planning for quarantine.2005