A Comparison of Recruitment Methods for a Prospective Cohort Study of Perinatal Psychoneuroimmunology among Black American Women

Abstract

Improved understanding of perinatal psychoneuroimmunology is needed, particularly to combat the high rates of maternal and infant mortality witnessed among Black Americans. We compared the success of recruitment by advertisement, in person, or by phone during the course of a prospective cohort study of perinatal psychoneuroimmunology among Black American women. Over 24 months, 363 women were assessed and 96 were enrolled. Women recruited by phone were less likely to complete full screening than women recruited by advertisement (OR = 0.32, p < 0.01) or in person (OR = 0.19, p < 0.01). Women recruited by advertisement were less likely to complete full screening than women recruited in person (OR = 0.60, p = 0.05). Odds of unsuccessful contact were 13.2 and 11.5 times greater among women recruited by phone versus by advertisement or in person, respectively (p values ≤ 0.01). Women recruited by advertisement and in person showed similar odds of unsuccessful contact (OR = 0.87, p = 0.76). Odds of screening decline were similar following recruitment in person or by phone when contact was successful (OR = 0.85, p = 0.76). Focusing on eligible women (n = 142), those recruited in person were significantly less likely to enroll than those recruited by advertisement (OR = 0.28, p < 0.01; Fig. 4). Considering all women (n = 363), odds of enrollment did not significantly differ among the recruitment groups (p values ≥ 0.09). Most (93.8%) enrolled women consented to biological specimen banking. Findings from this brief report provide a starting point for perinatal scientists to critically consider not only how to maximize research efforts but also how research team actions may perpetuate or assuage the research mistrust introduced by long-standing social inequities.