Association of MOS-Based Blast Exposure With Medical Outcomes
Open Access
- 31 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Neurology
- Vol. 11, 619
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00619
Abstract
The study of effects associated with human exposure to repeated low-level blast during training or operations of select military occupational specialties (MOS) challenges medical science because acute negative effects that might follow such exposures cannot be expected to be clear or prevalent. Any gross effects from such occupational blast exposure on health or performance should be expected to have been already identified and addressed by affected military units through changes to their standard training protocols. Instead, effects, if any, should be expected to be incremental in nature and to vary among individuals of different susceptibilities and exposure histories. Despite the challenge, occupational blast-associated effects in humans are emerging in ongoing research. The purpose of the present study was to examine medical records for evidence of blast-associated effects that may have clinical significance in current standard of care. We hypothesized that populations exposed to blast by virtue of their military occupation would have poorer global medical outcomes than cohorts less likely to have been occupationally exposed. Records from a population of 50,254 service members in MOSs with a high likelihood of occupational blast exposure were compared to records from a matched cohort of 50,254 service members in MOSs with a lower likelihood of occupational blast exposure. These two groups were compared in hospitalizations, outpatient visits, pharmacy, and disability ratings. The clearest finding was higher risk among blast-exposed MOSs for ambulatory encounters for tinnitus, with adjusted risk ratios of 1.19 (CI 1.03–1.37), 1.21 (CI 1.16–1.26), and 1.31 (CI 1.18–1.45) across career time points. Other hypothesized effects (i.e., neurological outcomes) were smaller and were associated with acute exposure. This study documents that service members in occupations that likely include repeated exposure to blast are at some increased risk for neurosensory conditions that present in medical evaluations. Other hypothesized risks from occupational exposure may manifest as symptomology not visible in the medical system or current standard of care. Separate studies, observational and epidemiological, are underway to evaluate further the potential for occupational risk, but the evidence presented here may indicate near-term opportunities to guide efforts to reduce neurosensory risk among exposed service members.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research and Materiel Command
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Military Occupations Most Affected by Head/Sensory Injuries and the Potential Job Impact of Those InjuriesMilitary Medicine, 2016
- Repeated Low-Level Blast Exposure: A Descriptive Human Subjects StudyMilitary Medicine, 2016
- Estimating Contact Exposure in Football Using the Head Impact Exposure EstimateJournal of Neurotrauma, 2015
- Occupation and other risk factors for injury among enlisted U.S. Army SoldiersPublic Health, 2015
- Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 as a Serum Neurotrauma Biomarker for Exposure to Occupational Low-Level BlastFrontiers in Neurology, 2015
- Relation of Repeated Low-Level Blast Exposure With Symptomology Similar to ConcussionJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2015
- Exposure to sub-concussive head injury in boxing and other sportsBrain Injury, 2014
- Serum Brain Biomarker Level, Neurocognitive Performance, and Self-Reported Symptom Changes in Soldiers Repeatedly Exposed to Low-Level Blast: A Breacher Pilot StudyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2013
- Matched Cohort Methods for Injury ResearchEpidemiologic Reviews, 2003
- Reducing Medical Attrition: The Role of the Accession Medical Standards Analysis and Research ActivityMilitary Medicine, 1999