Abstract PS11-25: Pilot trial of priming with oral TAK-228 and TAK-117 (PIKTOR) to increase DNA damage repair deficiency (DDRD) followed by cisplatin (cis) and nab paclitaxel (nab pac) in chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (metTNBC) pts
BACKGROUND: A subset of TNBCs have homologous recombination deficiency with upregulation of compensatory DNA repair pathways. The combination of TAK-228 and TAK-117 (PIKTOR), investigational oral TORC1/2 and PI3Kα selective inhibitors, respectively, is hypothesized to increase genomic instability (GI) and to increase DDRD, leading to increased sensitivity to DNA damaging chemotherapy and to checkpoint inhibitors in metTNBC pts. METHODS: 10 metTNBC pts received 4 mg PO TAK-228 and 200 mg PO TAK-117 QDx3d QW until disease progression (PD), followed by cis 75 mg/m2 plus nab pac 220 mg/m2 for up to 6 cycles. Primary endpoints were objective response rate with cis/nab pac and safety. Blood samples and biopsies of metastatic lesions were collected prior to and at PD on PIKTOR. Blood CTC analyses included enumeration, cell morphology, phenotypic heterogeneity, and predicted genomic instability (pGI) derived from cell phenotypes. RESULTS: 10 pts received PIKTOR followed by cis/nab pac. Median age: 51 yrs; median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range, 1-5); 7 pts had prior carboplatin; sites of metastases: lymph nodes (n=8); lung (n=6); chest wall (n=1); bone (n=1); brain (n=1). Median time on PIKTOR was 8 wks (range, 3-14). With cis/nab pac, 1 pt had PR, 2 had SD > 6 mos, 1 had SD and 6 had PD. 2 SD pts (sites LNs and bone) and 1 PD pt (sites LNs), all carboplatin-pretreated, whose pre-PIKTOR BCs were PDL1-negative (2 pts) or unknown (1 pt) have durable SD on pembrolizumab post-cis/nab pac for 1+ yrs. PIKTOR related AEs ≥30% included: fatigue (90%); nausea (80%); diarrhea (60%); vomiting (40%); stomatitis (40%); hyperglycemia (30%); rash (30%); cough (30%); chest pain (30%). Incidence and grade of cis/nab pac-related AEs were not greater than expected with this regimen. At PD on PIKTOR, higher CTC burden and pGI+ CTCs were observed in a subset of pts suggesting that some CTCs may have developed greater GI with PIKTOR treatment. Next generation sequencing (NGS) and reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analyses of biomarkers of DNA repair pathways pre-and post-PIKTOR tissues are underway and will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: Priming pts’ metTNBC with PIKTOR did not lead to durable responses with cis/nab pac in most pts in this pretreated population. However, 3/10 pts who had carboplatin-pretreated disease in LNs +/- bone, have highly durable SD on pembrolizumab following PIKTOR therapy. Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Esther San Roman Rodriguez, Priscilla Ontiveros, Rick Wenstrup, Tiziano Pramparo, Jessica Lang, Victoria Zismann, Natalia Briones, William Hendricks, Virginia Espina, Claudius Mueller, Maren K Levin. Pilot trial of priming with oral TAK-228 and TAK-117 (PIKTOR) to increase DNA damage repair deficiency (DDRD) followed by cisplatin (cis) and nab paclitaxel (nab pac) in chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (metTNBC) pts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-25.