Analysing trade-offs and synergies between SDGs for urban development, food security and poverty alleviation in rapidly changing peri-urban areas: a tool to support inclusive urban planning
Open Access
- 2 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 15 (6), 1601-1619
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00802-0
Abstract
Transitional peri-urban contexts are frontiers for sustainable development where land-use change involves negotiation and contestation between diverse interest groups. Multiple, complex trade-offs between outcomes emerge which have both negative and positive impacts on progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These trade-offs are often overlooked in policy and planning processes which depend on top-down expert perspectives and rely on course grain aggregate data which does not reflect complex peri-urban dynamics or the rapid pace of change. Tools are required to address this gap, integrate data from diverse perspectives and inform more inclusive planning processes. In this paper, we draw on a reinterpretation of empirical data concerned with land-use change and multiple dimensions of food security from the city of Wuhan in China to illustrate some of the complex trade-offs between SDG goals that tend to be overlooked with current planning approaches. We then describe the development of an interactive web-based tool that implements deep learning methods for fine-grained land-use classification of high-resolution remote sensing imagery and integrates this with a flexible method for rapid trade-off analysis of land-use change scenarios. The development and potential use of the tool are illustrated using data from the Wuhan case study example. This tool has the potential to support participatory planning processes by providing a platform for multiple stakeholders to explore the implications of planning decisions and land-use policies. Used alongside other planning, engagement and ecosystem service mapping tools it can help to reveal invisible trade-offs and foreground the perspectives of diverse stakeholders. This is vital for building approaches which recognise how trade-offs between the achievement of SDGs can be influenced by development interventions.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Sussex
- British Academy (UWB190102)
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using public participatory mapping to inform general land use planning and zoningLandscape and Urban Planning, 2018
- Implementing the "Sustainable Development Goals": towards addressing three key governance challenges-collective action, trade-offs, and accountabilityCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017
- The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and peopleCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2015
- Changes in the global value of ecosystem servicesGlobal Environmental Change, 2014
- An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, BrazilCities, 2010
- Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change researchGlobal Environmental Change, 2008
- What Is the Vulnerability of a Food System to Global Environmental Change?Ecology and Society, 2008
- Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisionsPublic Understanding of Science, 2007
- Effect of air pollution on peri-urban agriculture: a case studyEnvironmental Pollution, 2003
- The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capitalNature, 1997