The role of diagnostic laparoscopy for trauma at a high-volume level one center
- 4 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 35 (6), 2667-2670
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07687-1
Abstract
Background The role of minimally invasive surgery in trauma has continued to evolve over the past 20 years. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) has become increasingly utilized for the diagnosis and management of both blunt and penetrating injuries. Objective While the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy has been established for penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma, it remains a controversial tool for other injury patterns due to the concern for complications and missed injuries. We sought to examine the role of laparoscopy for the initial management of traumatic injuries at our urban Level 1 trauma center. Methods All trauma patients who underwent DL for blunt or penetrating trauma between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, indications for DL, injuries identified, rate of conversion to open surgery, and outcomes were evaluated. Results A total of 316 patients were included in the cohort. The mean age was 34.9 years old (± 13.7), mean GCS 14 (± 3), and median ISS 10 (4–18). A total of 110/316 patients (35%) sustained blunt injury and 206/316 patients (65%) sustained penetrating injury. Indications for DL included evaluation for peritoneal violation (152/316, 48%), free fluid without evidence of solid organ injury (52/316, 16%), evaluation of bowel injury (42/316, 13%), and evaluation for diaphragmatic injury (35/316, 11%). Of all DLs, 178/316 (56%) were negative for injury requiring intervention, which was 58% of blunt cases and 55% of penetrating cases. There were no missed injuries noted. Average hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients that underwent DL vs conversion to open exploration (2.2 days vs. 4.5 days, p < 0.05). Conclusion In this single institution, retrospective study, the high volume of cases appears to show that DL is a reliable tool for detecting injury and avoiding potential negative or non-therapeutic laparotomies. However, when injuries were present, the high rate of conversion to open exploration suggests that its utility for therapeutic intervention warrants further study.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Diagnosis of Intraabdominal Visceral InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2010
- How Well Does CT Predict the Need for Laparotomy in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Penetrating Abdominal Injury? A Review and Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2009
- Management of Patients With Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: A Western Trauma Association Multicenter TrialThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- The Contribution of Laparoscopy in Evaluation of Penetrating Abdominal WoundsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005
- Diagnostic Laparoscopy Decreases the Rate of Unnecessary Laparotomies and Reduces Hospital Costs in Trauma PatientsJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001
- Complications after Negative Laparotomy for TraumaThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1996
- Negative Laparotomy in Abdominal Gunshot WoundsThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1995
- PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC PERITONEAL LAVAGE, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNING, AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMAThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1993
- A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPY IN PENETRATING ABDOMINAL TRAUMAThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1993
- A Prospective Analysis of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in TraumaAnnals of Surgery, 1993