National Trends of Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Through Transapical Versus Endovascular Approach: From the National Inpatient Sample (NIS)
- 15 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
- Vol. 21 (8), 964-970
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk factors for length of stay and charge per day differ between older and younger hospitalized patients with AMLCancer Medicine, 2018
- Management of Patients With Aortic Valve StenosisMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2018
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and stroke: a comprehensive review2018
- Permanent pacemaker insertion in patients with conduction abnormalities post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review and proposed guidelinesAnnals of Translational Medicine, 2018
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: where are we now?Future Cardiology, 2017
- Vascular complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A concise literature reviewWorld Journal of Cardiology, 2017
- If TAVR Cannot Be Transfemoral, Then What?JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2016
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Causes of Death Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisJournal of the American Heart Association, 2015
- Percutaneous Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Calcific Aortic StenosisCirculation, 2002