On the determination of eye gaze and arrow direction: Automaticity reconsidered.
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
- Vol. 75 (3), 261-278
- https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000261
Abstract
It is a widely held view that the determination of eye gaze direction is "automatic" in various senses (e.g., innate; informationally encapsulated; triggered without intent). The determination of arrow direction is also held to be automatic (following a certain amount of learning) despite not being innate. The present experiments evaluate the automaticity assumption of both eyes and arrows in terms of an interference criterion. The results of 10 experiments support the inference that explicit judgements of eye gaze direction, when participants respond with a lateralized key press, are (a) neither automatic in the strong sense (they are interfered with by an uninformative, incongruent arrow in the display) and (b) nor are they are automatic in a weaker sense (uninformative, incongruent arrows interfere more strongly with the determination of eye gaze direction than uninformative, incongruent eyes interfere with the arrow direction task). However, the determination of arrow direction is also not strongly automatic, given that it is interfered with by irrelevant eyes. At least with respect to an interference criterion, the determination of eye gaze direction appears less prepotent than the determination of arrow direction, which itself is only weakly automatic.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows)The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2012
- Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomyTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2012
- A new form of human spatial attention: Automated symbolic orientingVisual Cognition, 2012
- Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental ChronometryCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2011
- Is attention necessary for perceiving gaze direction? It depends on how you look at it: Evidence from the locus-of-slack methodVisual Cognition, 2010
- Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognitionFrontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 2010
- Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesisPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2009
- Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
- Stroop Dilution Revisited: Evidence for Domain-Specific, Limited-Capacity Processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005