Effects of CPOE-based medication ordering on outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews
- 5 May 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
- Vol. 29 (10), 1.7-2
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010436
Abstract
Background Computerised provider order entry (CPOE) systems are widely used in clinical settings for the electronic ordering of medications, laboratory tests and radiological therapies. However, evidence regarding effects of CPOE-based medication ordering on clinical and safety outcomes is mixed. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) to characterise the cumulative effects of CPOE use for medication ordering in clinical settings. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify published SRs from inception to 12 February 2018. SRs investigating the effects of the use of CPOE for medication ordering were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included SRs. Results Seven SRs covering 118 primary studies were included for review. Pooled studies from the SRs in inpatient settings showed that CPOE use resulted in statistically significant decreases in medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs); however, there was considerable variation in the magnitude of their relative risk reduction (54%–92% for errors, 35%–53% for ADEs). There was no significant relative risk reduction on hospital mortality or length of stay. Bibliographic analysis showed limited overlap (24%) among studies included across all SRs. Conclusion SRs on CPOEs included predominantly non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies with varying foci. SRs predominantly focused on inpatient settings and often lacked comparison groups; SRs used inconsistent definitions of outcomes, lacked descriptions regarding the effects on patient harm and did not differentiate among the levels of available decision support. With five of the seven SRs having low to moderate quality, findings from the SRs must be interpreted with caution. We discuss potential directions for future primary studies and SRs of CPOE.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R21HS025443)
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews - what does the evidence tell us?Systematic Reviews, 2013
- The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancerSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Factors contributing to an increase in duplicate medication order errors after CPOE implementationJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findingsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2011
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009
- The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support on the Rates of Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic ReviewJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- A qualitative study of the implementation of a bioinformatics tool in a biological research laboratoryInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2007
- "e-Iatrogenesis": The Most Critical Unintended Consequence of CPOE and other HITJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2007
- Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order EntryJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006