Internet and social media use in cancer patients: association with distress and perceived benefits and limitations
- 2 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 29 (9), 5273-5281
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06077-0
Abstract
Objective Cancer patients may turn to social media (SM) to cope with distress. We investigated associations between distress and internet/SM use for cancer information/support. Methods Adult patients at a Canadian cancer centre completed a cross-sectional survey on sociodemographics, health status, use of cancer online resources and distress (EQ5D-5L). Statistical models adjusted for relevant variables. Results Of 376 participants, median age was 52 years, time since diagnosis was 1.63 years, 272 (74%) had post-secondary education and 192 (51%) were female. For cancer information/support, 276 (73%) used internet and 147 (39%) SM. Dose response relationships were observed between distress and cancer-related internet (p = 0.02), and SM use (p < 0.001). Respondents using internet/SM for cancer information/support reported greater internet confidence (internet OR = 4.0, 95% CI: 1.9–8.3; SM OR = 4.18, 95%, CI: 1.9–11.3), higher education (internet OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7–5.2; SM OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.2–4.1) and were more likely female (internet OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5–4.6; SM OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3–3.4). For SM for cancer information/support, more used SM > 30 min daily (OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 2.1–5.7), and were distressed (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.0–2.7). SM benefits were to learn about cancer (93; 25%), distract from cancer (85; 23%) and connect with survivors (81; 22%). SM limitations were privacy (161; 43%), quality (90; 24%) and personal applicability (85; 23%). Females used SM more to connect with survivors than males (p = 0.001). Conclusions Greater internet confidence, higher education and being female were associated with cancer-related internet/SM use. Distressed cancer patients were also more likely to turn to SM. Privacy concerns may limit SM use for coping. Future research should determine how to optimize SM in caring for and connecting with patients and reduce cancer-related distress.Funding Information
- Alan B Brown Chair in Molecular Genetics, Lusi Wong Family Fund, Posluns Family Foundaiton, ELLICSR Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Canadian Valuation of EQ-5D Health States: Preliminary Value Set and Considerations for Future Valuation StudiesPLOS ONE, 2012
- A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer‐to‐peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 2010
- Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social MediaBusiness Horizons, 2010
- Screening for Emotional Distress in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Assessment InstrumentsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Empowering Processes and Outcomes of Participation in Online Support Groups for Patients With Breast Cancer, Arthritis, or FibromyalgiaQualitative Health Research, 2008
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Health Behaviors, Prostate Cancer, and MasculinitiesMen and Masculinities, 2007
- eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy ScaleJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2006
- Lay constructions of decision‐making in cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 2002
- Communicating Breast Cancer On-Line: Support and Empowerment on the InternetWomen & Health, 1997