Aural foreign body removal: there is no one-size-fits-all method
Open Access
- 1 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Open Access Emergency Medicine
- Vol. ume 10, 177-182
- https://doi.org/10.2147/oaem.s178850
Abstract
Background: Managing patients with aural foreign body (AFB) may pose a dilemma regarding which removal technique to use for different AFB types. The current study comprises a review of all the possible methods one could employ in removing AFB. My aim was to describe the best methods for different types of AFBs, complete with a description of the method and tool(s) required, and descriptions of the AFBs for which they are best used. Materials and methods: The medical literature published between 2000 and 2016 was reviewed using Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus to compile a list of all published AFB removal methods. Results: Ten methods were identified and described, each having their own advantages for different AFBs. Patients normally permit very few attempts, so the first AFB removal attempt should ideally be the only one. Conclusion: There is no single method guaranteed to work with all AFBs, so this report also contains a flowchart to aid deciding which technique to use.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Removal of Foreign Bodies from the Ear and NoseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Superglue ear: our experience and a review of the literature.2013
- Superglue accidentally used as ear drops.2012
- Removal of foreign body from the external ear using the lasso techniqueClinical Otolaryngology, 2011
- Ear and Nose Foreign BodiesClinical Pediatrics, 2005
- Foreign bodies in the ear: a simple technique for removal analysed in vitroEmergency Medicine Journal, 2005
- Management of foreign bodies in the ear, nose and throat.Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2004
- Foreign bodies in the nose and ear: a review of techniques for removal in the emergency departmentEmergency Medicine Journal, 2000