Stakeholder perspectives and requirements to guide the development of digital technology for palliative cancer services: a multi-country, cross-sectional, qualitative study in Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe
Open Access
- 4 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Palliative Care
- Vol. 20 (1), 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00694-y
Abstract
Coverage of palliative care in low and middle-income countries is very limited, and global projections suggest large increases in need. Novel approaches are needed to achieve the palliative care goals of Universal Health Coverage. This study aimed to identify stakeholders’ data and information needs and the role of digital technologies to improve access to and delivery of palliative care for people with advanced cancer in Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe. We conducted a multi-country cross-sectional qualitative study in sub-Saharan Africa. In-depth qualitative stakeholder interviews were conducted with N = 195 participants across Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe (advanced cancer patients n = 62, informal caregivers n = 48, health care professionals n = 59, policymakers n = 26). Verbatim transcripts were subjected to deductive and inductive framework analysis to identify stakeholders needs and their preferences for digital technology in supporting the capture, transfer and use of patient-level data to improve delivery of palliative care. Our coding framework identified four main themes: i) acceptability of digital technology; ii) current context of technology use; iii) current vision for digital technology to support health and palliative care, and; iv) digital technologies for the generation, reporting and receipt of data. Digital heath is an acceptable approach, stakeholders support the use of secure data systems, and patients welcome improved communication with providers. There are varying preferences for how and when digital technologies should be utilised as part of palliative cancer care provision, including for increasing timely patient access to trained palliative care providers and the triaging of contact from patients. We identified design and practical challenges to optimise potential for success in developing digital health approaches to improve access to and enhance the delivery of palliative cancer care in Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe. Synthesis of findings identified 15 requirements to guide the development of digital health approaches that can support the attainment of global health palliative care policy goals.Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (MR/S014535/1)
- Research England Quality-Related Global Challenges Research Fund (QR GCRF)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Hospital-Based Palliative Care Service for Patients With Advanced Organ Failure in Sub-Saharan Africa Reduces Admissions and Increases Home Death RatesJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2014
- Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health researchBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregiversEmergencias, 2013
- Technologies to Support End-of-Life CareSeminars in Oncology Nursing, 2011
- What Is the Evidence That Palliative Care Teams Improve Outcomes for Cancer Patients and Their Families?The Cancer Journal, 2010
- Advancing Palliative Care as a Human RightJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2009
- Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development processInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009
- ‘They’re part of the team’: participant evaluation of the ACTIVE interventionPalliative Medicine, 2009
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative researchQualitative Research, 2001