Requests for somatic support after neurologic death determination: Canadian physician experiences
Open Access
- 10 November 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
- Vol. 68 (3), 293-314
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01852-9
Abstract
Purpose Neurologic determination of death (NDD) is legally accepted as death in Canada but remains susceptible to misunderstandings. In some cases, families request continued organ support after NDD. Conflicts can escalate to formal legal challenges, causing emotional, financial, and moral distress for all involved. We describe prevalence, characteristics, and common experiences with requests for continued organ support following NDD in Canada. Methods Mixed-methods design combining anonymous online survey with semi-structured interviews of Canadian critical care physicians (448 practitioners, adult and pediatric). Results One hundred and six physicians responded to the survey and 12 participated in an interview. Fifty-two percent (55/106) of respondents had encountered a request for continued organ support after NDD within two years, 47% (26/55) of which involved threat of legal action. Requests for continued support following NDD ranged from appeals for time for family to gather before ventilator removal to disagreement with the concept of NDD. Common responses to requests included: consultation with an additional physician (54%), consultation with spiritual services (41%), and delay of one to three days for NDD acceptance (49%). Respondents with prior experience were less likely to recommend ancillary tests (P = 0.004) or consultation with bioethics services (P = 0.004). Qualitative analysis revealed perceptions that requests for continued organ support were driven by mistrust, tensions surrounding decision-making, and cultural differences rather than a lack of specific information about NDD. Conclusions Family requests for continued somatic support following NDD were encountered by half our sample of Canadian critical care physicians. Mitigation strategies require attention to the multifaceted social contexts surrounding these complex scenarios.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A survey of American neurologists about brain death: understanding the conceptual basis and diagnostic tests for brain deathAnnals of Intensive Care, 2012
- Accommodating Religious Beliefs in the ICU: A Narrative Account of a Disputed DeathNarrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 2011
- A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of cliniciansCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- Why relatives do not donate organs for transplants: ‘sacrifice’ or ‘gift of life’?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2008
- A SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTS USED FOR BRAIN DEATH BY NEUROSURGEONS IN CANADANeurosurgery, 2007
- Severe brain injury to neurological determination of death: Canadian forum recommendationsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Living Cadavers and the Calculation of DeathBody & Society, 2004
- The Point of TriangulationJournal of Nursing Scholarship, 2001
- Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative researchNursing Standard, 2001
- A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain DeathJAMA, 1968