What is the difference between perceived and actual risk of distracted driving? A field study on a real highway
Open Access
- 2 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (4), e0231151
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231151
Abstract
Distracted driving is a leading cause of traffic accidents. It is influenced by driver attitude toward secondary tasks; however, field-based studies on the effects of low-perceived-risk tasks on lateral driving have rarely been reported. A total of 17 experienced non-professional drivers were recruited to participate in two secondary tasks: a cognitive experiment (conversation) and a visual distraction experiment (observation of following vehicles), each representing low-perceived-risk secondary tasks. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the effects of low-perceived-risk tasks on lateral driving performance. ANOVA results indicated that compared with baseline (no task) lateral performance, lane-keeping ability was enhanced during cognitive distractions. In the visual distraction experiment, more than 50% of the distractions required 1-2 s. Lane deviation and its growth rate increased with the duration of distraction. Compared with cognitive distraction, lane deviation increased significantly with visual distraction, and lane-keeping performance was seriously impaired. For low-perceived-risk tasks, visual distractions impaired driving safety more seriously, compared with cognitive distractions, suggesting that drivers misjudge the risks associated with visual tasks. These results can contribute to the design of advanced driving-assistance systems and improve professional driver programs, potentially reducing the frequency of traffic accidents caused by distracted driving.Funding Information
- National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1600501)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Driver distraction in an unusual environment: Effects of text-messaging in tunnelsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2013
- The effect of visual and cognitive distraction on driver’s anticipation in a simulated car following scenarioTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011
- Driver secondary tasks in Germany: Using interviews to estimate prevalenceAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2011
- The impact of a naturalistic hands-free cellular phone task on heart rate and simulated driving performance in two age groupsTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011
- Evaluation of different speech and touch interfaces to in-vehicle music retrieval systemsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2010
- Differences of drivers’ reaction times according to age and mental workloadAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2008
- Factors influencing subjective ranking of driver distractionsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2008
- Driving performance while using cell phones: an observational studyJournal of Safety Research, 2006
- Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performanceAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2005
- Predicting the effects of cellular-phone dialing on driver performanceCognitive Systems Research, 2002