Clinical Ethics Consultation in Neurology – a case series
Open Access
- 4 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Neurology
- Vol. 21 (1), 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02244-2
Abstract
Background: The concept of clinical ethics consultation (CECs) was implemented to provide support in ethical controversies in clinical settings and are offered in at least every second hospital in Germany. Neurological disorders often require complex decision-making. The aims of this study were to determine which situations lead to CEC in neurology and to investigate the influence of the individual patient’s wishes on the recommendation.Methods: Standardised CEC protocols in the years 2011 to 2017 at the University Hospitals of Goettingen and Jena were retrospectively surveyed. The contents were categorised along existing protocol templates of CEC scenarios and subsequently paraphrased and reduced to significant meanings.Results: 27 CEC scenarios which were facilitated by various professional disciplines were reviewed. Stroke was the most frequent underlying condition. Nearly all patients were not able to consent. Mostly, the relatives acted as representatives or health advocates. In 67 % of cases, a sense of conflict triggered a CEC; in 33 % a sense of uncertainty was the reason for the CEC request. In 21 CEC scenarios, a recommendation was reached in consensus with all parties involved. In 59 % of cases, a decision was made to continue medical therapy. In seven cases, the patient’s wishes led to a limitation of therapy, while in just two cases this decision was made primarily relying on the patient’s best interest. In only 13 % of cases, a valid advance directive led to respective therapeutic consequences.Conclusions: CEC is feasible for consensus-finding not only in conflicts, but also in situations of therapeutic uncertainty in neurology. There is a special importance of the patient’s wishes in decision-making in neurology. However, only in a few cases were advance directives precise and specific enough to have sufficient and decisive weight in therapeutic decision-making.Funding Information
- Open Access Publication Funds of the Goettingen University
- Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementation of Clinical Ethics Consultation in German HospitalsScience and Engineering Ethics, 2015
- When healthcare professionals cannot do the right thing: A systematic review of moral distress and its correlatesJournal of Health Psychology, 2015
- Ethikberatung im Krankenhaus – Sachstand und kritischer AusblickEthik in der Medizin, 2015
- Patient’s Autonomy According to German LawVeröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim, 2013
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national surveyJournal of Medical Ethics, 2011
- Systematic Review: The Effect on Surrogates of Making Treatment Decisions for OthersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Standards für Ethikberatung in Einrichtungen des GesundheitswesensEthik in der Medizin, 2010
- Ethics Consultations in Stroke and Neurological Disease: A 7-Year Retrospective ReviewNeurocritical Care, 2008
- Ethics Consultation in United States Hospitals: A National SurveyAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2007
- Effect of Ethics Consultations on Nonbeneficial Life-Sustaining Treatments in the Intensive Care SettingJAMA, 2003