Tele-visits for GERD: "Ecofriendly, efficient and effective"
- 1 June 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 38 (6), 905-909
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16148
Abstract
Background and AimSars-CoV-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to telemedicine for many healthcare encounters. The environmental impact of this transition in gastroenterology (GI) combined with user experience has not been studied. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent telemedicine visits (telephone and video) at a GI clinic at West Virginia University.Distance of patients' residence from clinic x 2 was calculated, and Environmental Protection Agency calculators utilized to calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that were avoided from tele-visits.Patients were reached by telephone and were asked questions to fill in a validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire with Likert scales (1-7). Variables were also collected via chart review. ResultsA total of 81 video and 89 telephone visits were conducted for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) between March 2020 and March 2021. A total of 111 patients were enrolled, with a response rate of 65.29%. Mean age was lower in the video visit cohort compared with the telephone visit cohort (43.45 +/- 14.32 years vs 52.34 +/- 17.46 years). Most patients had medications prescribed during the visit (79.3%), and a majority had laboratory testing orders placed (57.7%).We calculated a total distance of 8732 miles that the patients would have traveled if they were to present for in-person visits (including return trips). A total of 393.3 gallons of gasoline would have been required to transport these patients to and from the healthcare facility to their residence. A total of 3.5 metric tons of GHG's were saved by avoiding 393.3 gallons of gasoline for travel. In relatable terms, this is equivalent to burning more than 3500 pounds of coal. This averages to 31.5-kg GHG emissions and 3.54 gallons of gasoline saved per patient. ConclusionTelemedicine for GERD resulted in significant environmental savings and was rated highly for access, satisfaction, and usability by patients. Telemedicine for GERD can be an excellent alternative to in-person visits.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Doctor Will Call You Now! Telemedicine in the Midst of a PandemicClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2020
- Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinementNature Climate Change, 2020
- Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory SymptomsGastroenterology, 2020
- Impact of a Telemedicine Program on the Reduction in the Emission of Atmospheric Pollutants and Journeys by RoadInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019
- Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2016
- Environmental Impacts of the U.S. Health Care System and Effects on Public HealthPLOS ONE, 2016
- Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine Solutions - Unexplored Opportunity for Reducing Carbon Emissions in the Health SectorPLOS ONE, 2014
- Role of Endoscopy in GERDGastroenterology Clinics of North America, 2014
- Telemedicine Can Make Healthcare GreenerTelemedicine and e-Health, 2010
- Use of videoconferencing in Wales to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, travel costs and timeJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2009